1993
DOI: 10.1002/crat.2170280117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Tables for Crystallography. Volume C: Mathematical, Physical and Chemical Tables. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London 1992 (published for the International Union of Crystallography), 883 Seiten, ISBN 0‐792‐3‐16‐38X

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
177
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
177
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neutral atom scattering factors and values used to calculate the linear absorption coefficient are from the International Tables for X-ray Crystallography (1992). 23 All figures were generated using ORTEP.…”
Section: Structure Refinement Of Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neutral atom scattering factors and values used to calculate the linear absorption coefficient are from the International Tables for X-ray Crystallography (1992). 23 All figures were generated using ORTEP.…”
Section: Structure Refinement Of Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the structural model is estimated by the crystallographic index, R cryst , and then verified by means of chemical validation. Presently the most popular atomic FFs used in crystallography are listed in the International Tables for Crystallography [14]. The analytical expression (7) may be used as a possible alternative.…”
Section: Further Applications and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such numerical calculations can be found in several tables [12][13][14]. Simultaneously, there has been many attempts toward analytical evaluations of atomic FFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that the mean inner potential of carbon is 6.8 V [65] and that good contrast can be achieved even if the phase shift is 1 radian away from π, the optimal phase plate should have a thickness of 71 nm but can be in error by ±24 nm and still achieve good contrast. It is more likely that poor image contrast will result from the difficulties in positioning the aperture.…”
Section: Phase Plate Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%