2012
DOI: 10.1159/000334716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Reporting Scale of <i>BCR-ABL1</i> Fusion Transcript in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: First Report from India

Abstract: Achieving a major molecular response (MMR) is an important predictor of progression-free survival in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib. This requires accurate measurement of BCR-ABL1 transcripts normalized to a control gene, as well as defining a level (BCR-ABL1/control gene ratio) that will correlate with sustained clinical response. To make these measurements comparable between laboratories, an international scale (IS) is necessary. A BCR-ABL1/control gene ratio of 0.10% represents MMR … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34-37 Studies in which there were no data on patients who died or analysis was confined to patients who were followed-up in the outpatient department were also excluded. 38 Of the 37 studies thus reviewed, one was related to epidemiology, 36 one concerned efforts to set up monitoring facilities in India, 7 six reported on the mutation profile in Indian patients receiving imatinib, five reported outcomes in pediatric patients, and 24 discussed outcomes in adult patients (Fig 1). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34-37 Studies in which there were no data on patients who died or analysis was confined to patients who were followed-up in the outpatient department were also excluded. 38 Of the 37 studies thus reviewed, one was related to epidemiology, 36 one concerned efforts to set up monitoring facilities in India, 7 six reported on the mutation profile in Indian patients receiving imatinib, five reported outcomes in pediatric patients, and 24 discussed outcomes in adult patients (Fig 1). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To counter this, international standardization has been proposed, but there are few laboratories in India that have standardized testing available. 7 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratios greater than 1.0 suggest the samples were diagnostic samples whereas ratios less than 1.0 suggest they are follow-up samples. 24,25 This study therefore had 44 diagnostic samples and 6 follow up samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non‐IS‐standardized laboratory results can be useful in showing the trend in MR in serially collected samples from the same patient, but may not always reliably indicate whether that patient has reached or missed these key BCR‐ABL1 levels – thus increasing the risk of inappropriate treatment decisions. Adoption of the IS for MR reporting requires either (i) the experimental calculation (and periodical revalidation) of a conversion factor through the exchange of batches of samples between national reference centres and the constellation of local laboratories engaged in CML patient monitoring (Muller et al , ; Balasubramanian et al , ; Yoshida et al , ) or (ii) routine use of one of the commercial kits containing reference materials calibrated on the international standards recently developed by the World Health Organization (White et al , , , ).…”
Section: Current Mr Monitoring Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%