2017
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Subcommittee for the Taxonomy of Rhizobium and Agrobacterium Minutes of the meeting, Budapest, 25 August 2016

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and the means by which the new genera were initially described has caused skepticism. This was also evident from the minutes of the International committee on systematics of prokaryotes subcommittee for the taxonomy of Rhizobium and Agrobacterium , which discussed this subject during the 12th Nitrogen fixation Conference held in Budapest, Hungary on 25 August 2016 [ 10 ]. The subcommittee stated their position as “Research efforts directed towards robust characterization and taxonomy of Burkholderia s.l.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the means by which the new genera were initially described has caused skepticism. This was also evident from the minutes of the International committee on systematics of prokaryotes subcommittee for the taxonomy of Rhizobium and Agrobacterium , which discussed this subject during the 12th Nitrogen fixation Conference held in Budapest, Hungary on 25 August 2016 [ 10 ]. The subcommittee stated their position as “Research efforts directed towards robust characterization and taxonomy of Burkholderia s.l.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although each group was recently classified into new prokaryotes genera (PBE species belong to the Paraburkholderia genus [ 22 ], BGG species belong to the Caballeronia genus [ 23 ], while BCC species remain in the Burkholderia genus), some authors still disagree with that classification [ 21 , 24 ]. In fact, the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes, Subcommittee for the Taxonomy of Rhizobium and Agrobacterium have recently stated the needed for a more conclusive approach to unravel the taxonomy of the Burkholderia genus [ 25 ]. Clearly, a more robust analysis is needed to define a robust taxonomy into this bacterial genus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the help of alternative markers and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) (Stepkowski et al, 2005 ; Vinuesa et al, 2005b ), species delineation became more feasible. Now the number of validly published bradyrhizobial species is rapidly increasing since 2012 (Figure 1 ) and currently counting 42 validly published species, more than half of which have been published since 2014 (Parté, 2014 ; de Lajudie and Young, 2017 ). Approximately one third of the described species originates from South America, one third from other regions, and a large number from China, while only few originate from SSA (Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Global Species Discovery Of Bradyrhizobium mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Increase of described species of the genus Bradyrhizobium with time. Data includes all species officially listed (Parté, 2014 ; de Lajudie and Young, 2017 ), and the effectively, but not validly, published species “ B. arachidis ,” “ B. valentinum ,” “ B. brasilense ,” “ B. sacchari ,” “ B. centrolobii ,” “ B. macuxiense ,” and “ B. shewense ” (Wang et al, 2013 ; Durán et al, 2014 ; Aserse et al, 2017 ; da Costa et al, 2017 ; de Matos et al, 2017 ; Michel et al, 2017 ). …”
Section: Global Species Discovery Of Bradyrhizobium mentioning
confidence: 99%