2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal control material weakness opinions and the market's reaction to securities fraud litigation announcements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also requires external auditors to report independently on the effectiveness of audit clients’ internal control and risk management systems (PCAOB, 2002; Mallin, 2016). Tsai and Huang (2020) find that declines in stock price on securities fraud litigation announcement dates are significantly more severe for publicly litigated firms receiving US SOX 404 internal control material weakness opinions.…”
Section: Corporate Governance Mechanisms Recommended For Countering F...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It also requires external auditors to report independently on the effectiveness of audit clients’ internal control and risk management systems (PCAOB, 2002; Mallin, 2016). Tsai and Huang (2020) find that declines in stock price on securities fraud litigation announcement dates are significantly more severe for publicly litigated firms receiving US SOX 404 internal control material weakness opinions.…”
Section: Corporate Governance Mechanisms Recommended For Countering F...mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Research has found that firms disclosing MW tend to be smaller, poorer and more unstable in organizational structure; moreover, these firms also tend to have greater complexity, lower audit committee member tenure, higher growth, poor accruals quality, greater exposure to accounting-related risks and a greater likelihood of fraud (Doyle et al , 2007b; Ashbaugh et al , 2007; Donelson et al , 2017). Recent research has also found that decreases in stock market price are more severe for litigated firms reporting MW (Tsai and Huang, 2021).…”
Section: Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, such penalties tarnish a firm's reputation and erode the credibility of disclosures. This can increase transaction costs such as corporate financing costs and audit fees (Lee & Ha, 2021; Wu et al, 2021; Yuan et al, 2016), diminish cumulative returns for firms (Firth et al, 2011), and trigger unfavorable market responses from investors (Tsai & Huang, 2021). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that in firms subjected to administrative penalties, executives face risks such as salary reductions and demotions (Conyon & He, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%