Interlingual lexical organisation for multilingual lexical databases in NADIA

Sérasset, Gilles

doi:10.3115/991886.991933

Cited by 15 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The architecture of the Papillon multilingual dictionary is based on Gilles Sérasset (1994) and has been prototyped by Blanc (1999). This architecture uses a pivot structure based on multiple monolingual volumes linked to an interlingual acception volume.…”

Section: Macrostructurementioning

confidence: 99%

Frameworks, implementation and open problems for the collaborative building of a multilingual lexical database

Mangeot-Lerebours

Sérasset

Andrès

2002

COLING-02 on SEMANET Building and Using Semantic Networks -

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many NLP systems are based on lexical data. The development costs of such data are a major drawback in such NLP systems. In order to cut these costs, we adopt a strategy inspired from "open-source" projects to allow volunteers to collaborate in the creation of a multilingual lexical database. For this, we had to specify and develop tools to manage a lexical database containing information complete and detailed enough to be usable for a wide range of applications. This paper presents our project and details the tools, frameworks and structures used to manage such a database. We will also show some research problems still to be addressed in this context. Résumé La connaissance linguistique reste une constituante importante de nombreux systèmes de traitement automatique des langues (TAL). Le coût de création d'un dictionnaire est l'un des freins majeurs dans le développement de ces systèmes. Afin de réduire les coûts de création de cette connaissance lexicale, nous adoptons une méthode inspirée des projets "open-source" afin de créer une base lexicale multilingue. Pour cela, nous avons spécifié et développé des outils de gestion d'une base lexicale contenant des informations suffisamment complètes et détaillées pour êtres utilisées dans de nombreuses applications différentes. Cet article présente notre projet et détaille les outils, les cadres et les structures utilisées pour la gestion de cette base. Nous montrons aussi certains problèmes de recherche ouverts qu'il nous faut aborder dans ce contexte.

show abstract

Section: Macrostructurementioning

confidence: 99%

Frameworks, implementation and open problems for the collaborative building of a multilingual lexical database

Mangeot-Lerebours

Sérasset

Andrès

2002

COLING-02 on SEMANET Building and Using Semantic Networks -

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, Papillon [7,8] which is a Jibiki-based [9] general purpose collaborative multilingual dictionary, could not attract direct contribution. ITOLDU [10] collected 17000 English-French terms in 20 technical domains from 250 French students (learners of English) but it was not a sustainable activity.…”

Section: Introduction and Current Scenementioning

confidence: 99%

Passive and active contribution to multilingual lexical resources through online cultural activities

Daoud

Kageura

Boitet

et al. 2010

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering(NLPKE-2010)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we are proposing a contribution scheme for multilingual (preterminology). Preterminology is a lexical resource of unconfirmed terminology. We are explaining the difficulties of building lexical resources collaboratively. And we suggest a scheme of active and passive contributions that will ease the process and satisfy the Contribution Factors. We experimented our passive and active approaches with the Digital Silk Road Project where we analyzed visitors' behavior to find interest-ing trends and terminology candidates. And we built a contribution gateway that interacts with the visitors in order to motivate them to contribute while they are doing their usual activities.

show abstract

“…axies) as defined in (Sérasset, 1994) to represent such complex contrastive phenomena as generally described in general lexicography work. In this approach, each 'term meaning' is associated to an interlingual acception (or axie).…”

Section: Achieving Language/legal System Interoperabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

The LexALP information system

Lyding

Chiocchetti

Sérasset

et al. 2006

Proceedings of the Workshop on Multilingual Language Resources and Interoperability - MLRI '06

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard techniques used in multilingual terminology management fail to describe legal terminologies as they are bound to different legal systems and terms do not share a common meaning. In the LexALP project, we use a technique defined for general lexical databases to achieve cross language interoperability between languages of the Alpine Convention. In this paper we present the methodology and tools developed for the collection, description and harmonisation of the legal terminology of spatial planning and sustainable development in the four languages of the countries of the Alpine Space.

show abstract

Interlingual lexical organisation for multilingual lexical databases in NADIA

Cited by 15 publications

References 2 publications

Frameworks, implementation and open problems for the collaborative building of a multilingual lexical database

Frameworks, implementation and open problems for the collaborative building of a multilingual lexical database

Passive and active contribution to multilingual lexical resources through online cultural activities

The LexALP information system

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About