Intergenerational social mobility and allostatic load in Great Britain

Abstract

BackgroundIntergenerational social mobility is hypothesised to be a stressful process that has a negative effect on health. By examining the relationship between own socioeconomic position, parental socioeconomic position and allostatic load (AL) in a representative sample of the British population, we test this hypothesis.MethodsOur study uses cross-sectional data from 9851 adult participants of waves 2 and 3 of Understanding Society. The relationship between parental occupational class at age 14 years, respondents’ social class at the time of the interview and AL is explored by means of diagonal reference models, which allow us to disentangle the effects of parental social class, own social class and the mobility process. The AL score comprises the following biomarkers: (1) total cholesterol, (2) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, (3) triglycerides, (4) glycated haemoglobin, (5) C-reactive protein, (6) fibrinogen, (7) systolic blood pressure, (8) diastolic blood pressure, (9) resting heart rate, (10) body mass index and (11) waist circumference.ResultsAL is particularly high among the stable working class and low among the stable upper class. On average, current class and origin class exert about equal weight on current AL. However, social mobility—regardless of whether upwards or downwards—is not detrimental for AL. Furthermore, we find evidence that class of origin may be less important among those outside the labour market for reasons other than retirement.ConclusionBoth own social class and parental social class influence AL to a similar extent. However, we find no evidence that mobility trajectories exert any effects, good or bad, on AL.

Do socio-demographic factors predict children’s engagement in arts and culture? Comparisons of in-school and out-of-school participation in the Taking Part Survey

“…There are two main inferences from these findings. First, not only does an individual's own socio-economic status relate to arts engagement, as previously shown, but our findings suggest that the effects of socio-economic status on participation may transfer into the next generation (as also shown in academic achievement [39] and health outcomes [47]. It is possible that this is because factors such as wealth mean that some families are less able to pay for activities for their children.…”

Does downward social mobility make people more hostile towards immigrants?

“…There are other studies that have focused on social class, mobility, and broader political attitudes but findings regarding the role played by intergenerational loss are mixed (Breen, 2001;De Graaf et al, 1995;Jaime-Castillo and Marqués-Perales, 2019;Paterson, 2008). Several studies have looked at whether downward social mobility is associated with lower well-being or life satisfaction, however, there is no consensus on this question either (Becker and Birkelbach, 2018;Hadjar and Samuel, 2015;Kaiser and Trinh, 2019;Präg and Richards, 2019;Zhao et al, 2017). In this study, we add to this literature by studying the relationship between intergenerational social mobility and attitudes towards immigrants.…”

How does socio-economic position (SEP) get biologically embedded? A comparison of allostatic load and the epigenetic clock(s)

“…A handful of studies have examined the association of SEP with AL over the life course (Gustafsson et al, 2011;Gruenewald et al, 2012;Robertson et al, 2014;Solis et al, 2016;Prag and Richards, 2018). Comparison of results across studies is complicated by the fact that AL is not always measured using the same number or composition of biomarkers, but most of them have concluded that the socio-economic conditions of childhood and adulthood have separable and additive effects on AL.…”