2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial polarization and dielectric properties of aligned carbon nanotubes/polymer composites: The role of molecular polarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By addition of CNT, clusters of non-conductive TPU and highly conductive CNT form higher capability of polarization. Consequently, adding higher percentage of CNT [69][70][71][72] increases the conductivity and initial capacitance, but lowers slope of polarity growth. Within higher CNT concentrations, larger polar islands are being formed on the TPU film in presence of an electric field ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By addition of CNT, clusters of non-conductive TPU and highly conductive CNT form higher capability of polarization. Consequently, adding higher percentage of CNT [69][70][71][72] increases the conductivity and initial capacitance, but lowers slope of polarity growth. Within higher CNT concentrations, larger polar islands are being formed on the TPU film in presence of an electric field ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FT-IR and XRD datahas also revealed that the composites do not belong to a homogeneous system as the all the characteristic peaks of both components have been obtained. For such a semi heterogeneous system the high dielectric constant values are well explained on the basis of Maxwell-Wagner-Sillars effect [53,54]. When there are two media in contact that possess different conductivities and permittivity space, charges build up at their interfaces [55,56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polarization at the interfaces of the amorphous and crystallite phases and the molecular polarity especially due to N–H bond is the major cause of dielectric losses [54]. As shown in the SEM micrographs the porosity has greatly increased in the 5% of BaTiO 3 /Ppy which restricted the charge transport between the grains, the major cause of dielectric loss (εʺ) [51].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47] As the frequency increases (10 3 to 10 6 Hz), the contribution from interfacial polarization decreases, giving rise to an overall decrease in the dielectric constant values. [4,28,48] The interfacial polarization effect is considered negligible beyond 10 6 Hz. For our sample, we achieve ε r ≈ 4.68 for PU+h-BN and ≈2.92 for plain PU, a 1.6 times increase in ε r due to h-BN incorporation at 10 6 Hz.…”
Section: Dielectric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%