2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interexcited State Photophysics I: Benchmarking Density Functionals for Computing Nonadiabatic Couplings and Internal Conversion Rate Constants

Abstract: We present the first benchmarking study of nonadiabatic matrix coupling elements (NACMEs) calculated using different density functionals. Using the S 1 → S 0 transition in perylene solvated in toluene as a case study, we calculate the photophysical properties and corresponding rate constants for a variety of density functionals from each rung of Jacob’s ladder. The singlet photoluminescence quantum yield (sPLQY) is taken as a measure of accuracy, measured experimentally here as 0.955. Important quantum chemica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 233 publications
4
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The transition dipole moments across all optimized geometries show that, of the three optimized singlet geometries, only the S 1 state is optically bright, with an average moment of ∼2.87 au found on all geometries. This is slightly smaller than those moments found for perylene in previous works 102 but still larger than expected with respect to experiment. 102,223,224 From these results, we calculate transition dipole moments of μ D = 2.907 au (moment at the S 1 geometry) and μ A = 2.745 au (moment at the S 0 geometry), respectively.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The transition dipole moments across all optimized geometries show that, of the three optimized singlet geometries, only the S 1 state is optically bright, with an average moment of ∼2.87 au found on all geometries. This is slightly smaller than those moments found for perylene in previous works 102 but still larger than expected with respect to experiment. 102,223,224 From these results, we calculate transition dipole moments of μ D = 2.907 au (moment at the S 1 geometry) and μ A = 2.745 au (moment at the S 0 geometry), respectively.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…We employed a set of seven XCFs, representative of the typically selected hybrids in simulations of organic compounds, namely, B3LYP, PBE0, , BH&HLYP, CAM-B3LYP, ωB97, ωB97X, and ωB97X-D . Note that, to our knowledge, no previous systematic XCF benchmarks are available for k r , but for the specific case of perylene …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 We employed a set of seven XCFs, representative of the typically selected hybrids in simulations of organic compounds, namely, B3LYP, 61 PBE0, 62,63 BH&HLYP, 64 CAM-B3LYP, 65 ωB97, 66 ωB97X, 66 and ωB97X-D. 67 Note that, to our knowledge, no previous systematic XCF benchmarks are available for k r , but for the specific case of perylene. 29 As the experimental data were recorded in aprotic solutions, we used the polarizable continuum model (PCM) 68 to account for solvent−solute interactions at all stages of the electronic structure calculations. For the TD(A)-DFT calculations, the linear-response PCM model was used.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations