2017
DOI: 10.1287/moor.2016.0798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdicting Structured Combinatorial Optimization Problems with {0, 1}-Objectives

Abstract: Interdiction problems ask about the worst-case impact of a limited change to an underlying optimization problem. They are a natural way to measure the robustness of a system, or to identify its weakest spots. Interdiction problems have been studied for a wide variety of classical combinatorial optimization problems, including maximum s-t flows, shortest s-t paths, maximum weight matchings, minimum spanning trees, maximum stable sets, and graph connectivity. Most interdiction problems are NPhard, and furthermor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be very interesting to know whether there is any α < 2 and polynomial time algorithm that returns an interdiction set R with cost at most α B and residual flow at most α OPT . The technique of Burch et al can be applied to get bicriteria approximation algorithms for many other interdiction problems , and one can hope that an improvement would also generalize.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be very interesting to know whether there is any α < 2 and polynomial time algorithm that returns an interdiction set R with cost at most α B and residual flow at most α OPT . The technique of Burch et al can be applied to get bicriteria approximation algorithms for many other interdiction problems , and one can hope that an improvement would also generalize.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E.1 A Simple Bicriteria Algorithm for WNVIP We first provide a polynomial time algorithm that finds a (1+1/ , 1) or (1, 1+ )approximation for any > 0 for WNVIP in digraphs using a more direct proof than the earlier methods [3,6]. This proof was also given by Chuzhoy et al [8] in their study of k-route cuts, but we reproduce it since we build on it later.…”
Section: E Simple Approximations For Interdiction Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we do not know which case occurs a priori. In this line of work, Chestnut and Zenklusen [6] have extended the technique of Burch et al to derive pseudo-approximation algorithms for a larger class of NFI problems that have good LP descriptions (such as duals that are box-TDI).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bar-Noy et al 1995;Boros et al 2006;Israeli and Wood 2002;Khachiyan et al 2008), but in the meantime, the list of combinatorial problems studied in the context of interdiction has grown rapidly (cf. Chestnut and Zenklusen 2016;Dinitz and Gupta 2013;Furini et al 2019;Zenklusen 2014Zenklusen , 2010. A recent survey by Smith and Song (2020) captures the research in this area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%