1980
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.000353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions Among Three Trophic Levels: Influence of Plants on Interactions Between Insect Herbivores and Natural Enemies

Abstract: In his recent review of the developing theory of insect-plant interactions, Gilbert (52) identified four major thrusts in research: insect-plant coevolution, host plants as islands, plant apparency and chemical defense, and resource predictability versus evolutionary strategies of insects. From his review it is evident that, with a few exceptions (23, 45, 53, 64), devdoping theory is addressing primarily a two trophie levd system. In reality, of course, all terrestrial communities based on living plants are co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
1,327
5
53

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,055 publications
(1,408 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
23
1,327
5
53
Order By: Relevance
“…Most researchers now agree that natural enemies of arthropod herbivores, such as parasitoids and predators, must also be considered in models examining the evolution of direct defense strategies in plants (Price et al 1980). This approach has generally argued that natural enemies, by regulating herbivore populations, can act as important selective agents by reducing the need for plants to invest in chemical defenses when these are costly to maintain (van Dam et al 2000;Ode et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most researchers now agree that natural enemies of arthropod herbivores, such as parasitoids and predators, must also be considered in models examining the evolution of direct defense strategies in plants (Price et al 1980). This approach has generally argued that natural enemies, by regulating herbivore populations, can act as important selective agents by reducing the need for plants to invest in chemical defenses when these are costly to maintain (van Dam et al 2000;Ode et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since predatory bugs can also feed on plants (Stoner, 1970;Moreira et al, 1996Moreira et al, /1997, this behavior can affect their development through the ingestion of deleterious substances from resistant plants (Price et al, 1980;Bozer et al, 1996;Traugott & Stamp, 1997). As a consequence, adult longevity of this bug may be shorter and their fecundity and predation capacity could be lower on resistant plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed varietal differences can be ascribed mainly to differences between the Japanese and American varieties. Plant architecture, including the size and growth form, is known to influence arthropod abundance and diversity on plants (e.g., Andow and Prokrym, 1990;Lawton, 1983;Price et al, 1980;Rudgers and Whitney, 2006), and Price et al (1995) suggested correlations between plant size and insect abundance. Buckelew et al (2000) reported that soybean plant height and leaf area were positively correlated with the abundance of some canopy insects and negatively correlated with that of others in GMHT and conventional plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%