2016 IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ccst.2016.7815697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction evaluation of a mobile voice authentication system

Abstract: Abstract-Biometric recognition is nowadays widely used in smartphones, making the users' authentication easier and more transparent than PIN codes or patterns. Starting from this idea, the EU project PIDaaS aims to create a secure authentication system through mobile devices based on voice and face recognition as two of the most reliable and user-accepted modalities. This work introduces the project and the first PIDaaS usability evaluation carried out by means of the well-known HBSI model. In this experiment,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the HBSI framework defines metrics related to usability (satisfaction, eefficiency and effectiveness), cognitive (learnability and memorability), ergonomics (physical conditions) and signal processing (sample quality and processing capabilities) [4] to obtain a holistic view of the user's interaction with the biometric system. For further details about the HBSI please refer to [2][3][4][5][6][7]. This framework has been tested for a number of different modalities: hand geometry [5], fingerprint [4] and face [6].…”
Section: Biometric Interaction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the HBSI framework defines metrics related to usability (satisfaction, eefficiency and effectiveness), cognitive (learnability and memorability), ergonomics (physical conditions) and signal processing (sample quality and processing capabilities) [4] to obtain a holistic view of the user's interaction with the biometric system. For further details about the HBSI please refer to [2][3][4][5][6][7]. This framework has been tested for a number of different modalities: hand geometry [5], fingerprint [4] and face [6].…”
Section: Biometric Interaction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HBSI has also been applied to mobile implementations for dynamic signature [7]. A novel and extended implementation was proposed in our previous work [2,8] which incorporates mobile analytic tools and server logs to ensure sufficient data is captured.…”
Section: Biometric Interaction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations