2019
DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period

Abstract: Abstract. The modeling study presented here aims to estimate how uncertainties in global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions, variability, and trends may contribute to resolving discrepancies between simulated and observed methane (CH4) changes since 2000. A multi-model ensemble of 14 OH fields was analyzed and aggregated into 64 scenarios to force the offline atmospheric chemistry transport model LMDz (Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique) with a standard CH4 emission scenario over the period 2000–2016. The … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
7
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we continue our former studies (Zhao et al, 2019(Zhao et al, , 2020, in which we have quantified the impact of OH on top-down estimates of CH 4 emissions during the 2000s. This work aims to better understand the production and loss processes of OH and quantitatively assess their influence on the temporal changes in the CH 4 lifetime and the global CH 4 budget on a decadal scale since the 1980s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we continue our former studies (Zhao et al, 2019(Zhao et al, , 2020, in which we have quantified the impact of OH on top-down estimates of CH 4 emissions during the 2000s. This work aims to better understand the production and loss processes of OH and quantitatively assess their influence on the temporal changes in the CH 4 lifetime and the global CH 4 budget on a decadal scale since the 1980s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…One of the barriers to understanding atmospheric CH 4 changes is the CH 4 sink, which is mainly the chemical reaction with the hydroxyl radical (OH; Saunois et al, 2016Saunois et al, , 2017Saunois et al, , 2020Zhao et al, 2020) that determines the tropospheric CH 4 lifetime. The burden of atmospheric OH is determined by complex and coupled atmospheric chemical cycles influenced by anthropogenic and natural emissions of multiple atmospheric reactive species and also by climate change (Murray et al, 2013;Turner et al, 2018;Nicely et al, 2018), making it difficult to diagnose OH temporal changes from a single process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between transport models affect the chemical removal of CH 4 , leading to different chemical loss rates, even with the same OH distribution. However, uncertainties in the OH distribution and magnitude (Zhao et al, 2019) are not considered in our study, while it could contribute to a significant change in the chemical sink and then in the derived posterior emissions through the inverse process (Zhao et al, 2020). The chemical sink represents more than 90 % of the total sink, the rest being attributable to soil uptake (38 [27-45] Tg CH 4 yr −1 ).…”
Section: Global Budget Of Total Methane Sinksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Integrate the aforementioned different potential OH chemical fields, also including inter-annual variability, to assess the impact on the methane budget following Zhao et al (2020).…”
Section: Future Developments Missing Elements and Remaining Uncertamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of the ratio of NO to nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) in the upper troposphere (UT) frequently cannot be reconciled with models (Cohen et al, 2000;Silvern et al, 2018). Zhao et al (2019) show that differences in background NO at the single pptv level are responsible for differences in global modeled OH on the order of 50%. The ability to measure atmospheric NO at very low mixing ratios and with low uncertainty will be crucial to address these and other questions in atmospheric chemistry research for the foreseeable future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%