2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-laboratory evaluation of the EUROFORGEN Global ancestry-informative SNP panel by massively parallel sequencing using the Ion PGM™

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Universal Analysis Software (UAS) called alleles and genotypes based on the number of reads by applying a specified analytical (AT; 1.5%) and interpretation threshold (IT; 4.5%), except for DYS398II (AT: 5%; IT: 15%), DYS448 (AT: 3.3%; IT: 10%) and DYS635 (AT: 3.3%; IT: 10%) [45]. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis of aDNA samples were manually revised and no-call genotype corrected according to [11]. For example, no-call SNPs that fell below the manufacturer's default IT but in the range of 20 to 29 reads were manually corrected and genotype results put in brackets.…”
Section: Universal Analysis Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Universal Analysis Software (UAS) called alleles and genotypes based on the number of reads by applying a specified analytical (AT; 1.5%) and interpretation threshold (IT; 4.5%), except for DYS398II (AT: 5%; IT: 15%), DYS448 (AT: 3.3%; IT: 10%) and DYS635 (AT: 3.3%; IT: 10%) [45]. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis of aDNA samples were manually revised and no-call genotype corrected according to [11]. For example, no-call SNPs that fell below the manufacturer's default IT but in the range of 20 to 29 reads were manually corrected and genotype results put in brackets.…”
Section: Universal Analysis Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the emergence of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technologies, molecular genetic tools have been developed to characterise the nucleotide sequence of short tandem repeat (STR) markers that have so far been analysed using fragment sizing by capillary electrophoresis (CE) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. As is common practise in forensic genetics, such novel tools undergo detailed evaluation [3,[8][9][10][11][12] and validation [1,13,14] prior to their application in casework. Recent population studies have shown that sequencing of STRs lead to an increased power of discrimination compared to commonly used CE sizing by a) illustrating micro-variant structures and b) identifying sequence variations located in the repeat-(isometric variants; alleles of identical size but different in internal sequence) or flanking region [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, MPS technology has attracted much interest in the field of forensic science. Multiple studies have been carried out to study various forensic markers using MPS technology . All of these studies imply that MPS holds promise for forensic applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precise inference of the geographic background of an unknown DNA sample has been achieved with the analysis of ancestry-informative SNP markers whose bi- or tri-allelic distributions across populations are indicative of continental-scale geographic backgrounds. With the emergence of MPS techniques, larger ancestry-informative SNP marker PCR multiplexes were developed that can, for example, be used to differentiate between 5 major sub-continental populations (Africa, Europe, East Asia, Native America and Oceania) using 128 markers [6]. …”
Section: Limitations Of Confirmatory Forensic Dna Testing and New Avementioning
confidence: 99%