2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-laboratory assessment of a harmonized zebrafish developmental toxicology assay – Progress report on phase I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the vast majority of Tier-I hits (98%) had LogP values favoring water-to-embryo partitioning (LogP>0) and Tier-II hits clustered within a narrower range of LogP values relative to Tier-I hits, suggesting that a short (2-h) exposure biased hits to hydrophobic compounds within an optimal LogP range (LogP = ~2–5). Therefore, these results are consistent with other studies showing that compound bioactivity is not associated with compound size (for compounds ≤3000 g/mol) but, rather, tends to be dependent on compound hydrophobicity (LogP>0) and partitioning from water into zebrafish embryos (whether chorionated or not) over a specific exposure duration (de Koning et al, 2015; Gustafson et al, 2012; Pelka et al, 2017; Sachidanandan et al, 2008). Finally, the lack of structural similarity suggests that, similar to LogPs and molecular weights, 2D chemical structures do not have the potential to predict hits within our assay; however, it is important to note that this lack of predictability may be driven by the inherent chemical diversity of the LOPAC 1280 library.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On the other hand, the vast majority of Tier-I hits (98%) had LogP values favoring water-to-embryo partitioning (LogP>0) and Tier-II hits clustered within a narrower range of LogP values relative to Tier-I hits, suggesting that a short (2-h) exposure biased hits to hydrophobic compounds within an optimal LogP range (LogP = ~2–5). Therefore, these results are consistent with other studies showing that compound bioactivity is not associated with compound size (for compounds ≤3000 g/mol) but, rather, tends to be dependent on compound hydrophobicity (LogP>0) and partitioning from water into zebrafish embryos (whether chorionated or not) over a specific exposure duration (de Koning et al, 2015; Gustafson et al, 2012; Pelka et al, 2017; Sachidanandan et al, 2008). Finally, the lack of structural similarity suggests that, similar to LogPs and molecular weights, 2D chemical structures do not have the potential to predict hits within our assay; however, it is important to note that this lack of predictability may be driven by the inherent chemical diversity of the LOPAC 1280 library.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In 2009, an international group of pharmaceutical companies formed a consortium to develop a zebrafish development assay that could correctly classify a set of 10 teratogenic and 10 nonteratogenic compounds (Gustafson et al, 2012). The results of these toxicity tests were compared to mammalian data, and found to have an overall concordance of 60–70%.…”
Section: High-throughput Screening For Toxicity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach yielded 87% concordance with published in vitro teratogenicity data (Brannen et al, 2010). Improvements to this assay, including enzymatic removal of the chorion, repeating the assay with a distinct set of text compounds, and using various zebrafish strains, have been attempted to make a direct comparison between the chorion-on data published by the pharmaceutical company consortium and the chorion-off data to determine whether the presence of the chorion affected the sensitivity and specificity of the zebrafish embryo assay (Ball et al, 2014; Brannen et al, 2010; Gustafson et al, 2012; Panzica-Kelly, Zhang, & Augustine-Rauch, 2015). …”
Section: High-throughput Screening For Toxicity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these in vitro methods have the potential to screen thousands of compounds for their effects on complex pathways relevant to developmental processes and toxicities. 92 Many possible models have been explored, including hydra regeneration, 93 103 in vivo larval zebrafish assays, 104,105 and ESCs. 106,107 In some laboratories, murine ESCs were the model of choice for developmental toxicology studies.…”
Section: The Use Of Hpscs As Models For Developmental Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%