2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00092-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-firm network policies and firm performance: evaluating the impact of initiatives in the United Kingdom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A key feature of most of the extant network literature concerning alliance networks is the focus on 'repeated' and 'enduring' (Podolny and Page 1998) or 'sustained' (Huggins, 2001) interactions or relationships. Converse to alliances, contact networks consist of non-formalised interaction and relationships between organisations.…”
Section: Inter-organisational Network and Knowledge Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A key feature of most of the extant network literature concerning alliance networks is the focus on 'repeated' and 'enduring' (Podolny and Page 1998) or 'sustained' (Huggins, 2001) interactions or relationships. Converse to alliances, contact networks consist of non-formalised interaction and relationships between organisations.…”
Section: Inter-organisational Network and Knowledge Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Converse to alliances, contact networks consist of non-formalised interaction and relationships between organisations. The structure of these networks is often more dynamic, as organisations continually update and change their contacts (Burt 1992;Huggins 2000Huggins , 2001McEvily and Marcus 2005;Grabher and Ibert 2006;Trippl et al, 2009). Contact networks can be considered to be a particular form, or subset, of the type of wider contact systems facilitating the flow of resources and economic development within and across regions (Thorngren, 1970;Malecki, 1989;Anselmo de Castro and Jensen-Butler, 2003).…”
Section: Inter-organisational Network and Knowledge Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while both approaches give important insights, they are rarely treated together. Most academic analyses evaluating cluster policies have focused on one or the other; typically either case studies highlighting contextual elements (see for example : PARRILLI, 2004;PITELIS et al, 2006;ARANGUREN et al, 2008;BORRAS and TSAGDIS, 2008) or evaluations seeking to quantify direct effects in terms of a specific 'hard' outcome (see for example : HUGGINS, 2001;MCDONALD et al, 2007;MARTIN et al, 2011a;2011b;DE LA MAZA et al, 2012). The reality of cluster policies, however, is that the relationships between tangible and intangible effects are extremely difficult to de-limit.…”
Section: Cluster Policy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-firm networks consist of companies that are connected with each other through some form of sustained interaction, within which there is necessarily some type of common goal (Huggins 2001). Rosenfeld (1996) extends this split-up of networks by saying that networks may take the form of formal "hard" networks that involve firms joining together to co-produce, co-market, co-purchase, or cooperate in product or market development, or more informal "soft" networks that involve firms joining together to solve common problems, share information, or acquire new skills.…”
Section: Different Types Of Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can then be claimed that increasing the time companies commit to initiatives positively affects their sense of belonging within the network, as trust between companies is created. Projects based on informal task-specific initiatives appear to offer the most effective means of inter-company contact (Huggins, 2001). …”
Section: Different Types Of Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%