1997
DOI: 10.3354/meps152285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-colony variation in diet and reproductive performance of great skuas Catharacta skua

Abstract: Sustained population growth of great skuas Catharacta skua during the current century has been attributed largely to a high abundance of sandeels, principally Ammodytes marinus, and a plentiful supply of discards from whitefish trawlers in the vicinity of breeding colonies A new colony of great skuas was establ~shed at St Kilda, Outer Hebrides, in 1963 and has since grown rapidly despite an apparent lack of sandeels in the waters surrounding the archipelago and the presence of only a small whitefish fishery. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work has highlighted inter-colony differences in diet composition of great skuas (Phillips et al 1997, Votier et al 2007 which may relate to differences in the availability of the main prey (sandeels, discards and other birds), intra-specific competition or differences in foraging behaviour. A significant positive correlation between whiting otoliths in skua pellets and fish biomass esti- 367: 223-232, 2008 mates (from ICES-FishMap) within 30 km of focal colonies indicates that, for this fish at least, intercolony variation in consumption relates to spatial differences in fishing catches, which presumably relates to differences in whiting availability.…”
Section: Inter-colony Variation In Discard Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has highlighted inter-colony differences in diet composition of great skuas (Phillips et al 1997, Votier et al 2007 which may relate to differences in the availability of the main prey (sandeels, discards and other birds), intra-specific competition or differences in foraging behaviour. A significant positive correlation between whiting otoliths in skua pellets and fish biomass esti- 367: 223-232, 2008 mates (from ICES-FishMap) within 30 km of focal colonies indicates that, for this fish at least, intercolony variation in consumption relates to spatial differences in fishing catches, which presumably relates to differences in whiting availability.…”
Section: Inter-colony Variation In Discard Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If other feeding opportunities remained unchanged, reductions in discarding might result in reductions in numbers of great skuas, herring gulls and lesser black-backed gulls while having little direct negative effect on populations of northern fulmars, northern gannets or great blackbacked gulls. However, increased predation by great skuas as a consequence of diet switching when discard supplies are low might impact a number of other seabird species on which great skuas may feed, including black-legged kittiwakes, Atlantic puffins Fratercula arctica, European storm petrels Hydrobates pelagicus, Leach's petrels Oceanodroma leucorhoa, red-throated divers Gavia stellata, common eiders Somateria mollissima, great blackbacked gulls, and Arctic skuas Stercorarius parasiticus (Phillips et al, 1997(Phillips et al, , 1998, although variation in sandeel abundance may be a greater influence than variation in discard availability for predation rates of great skuas on other seabirds (Hamer et al, 1991;Ratcliffe et al, 1998aRatcliffe et al, , b, 2002Catry and Furness, 1999;Ratcliffe and Furness, 1999). Probably bird killing by great skuas will be a function of both sandeel and discard abundance (Caldow and Furness, 2001).…”
Section: Reductions In Discharge Of Discards and Offal At Seamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skuas (family Sterorcorariidae; taxonomy follows BirdLife International) are a group of highly opportunistic predator-scavengers (Furness 1987, Phillips et al 1997, 2004a. During the breeding season, some species or populations catch few or no prey by themselves at sea, which is perhaps why skuas are sometimes excluded from comparative analyses of seabird ecology and life history (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%