2017
DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1338346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intentional ingestion of elemental mercury requiring multi-step decontamination and prophylactic appendectomy: a case report and treatment proposal

Abstract: After ingestion, metal retention in appendix is quite frequent. Evidence about optimal treatment are different and based on case reports. A multi-step approach with multidisciplinary evaluation tailored to the patient is suggested.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recently published paper by Michielan et al[3], a review of similar case reports was performed. Including their own case, they found only 10 described cases of elemental mercury sequestration in the appendix after oral ingestion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a recently published paper by Michielan et al[3], a review of similar case reports was performed. Including their own case, they found only 10 described cases of elemental mercury sequestration in the appendix after oral ingestion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical consequences of oral ingestion of mercury are largely unknown since the vast ma-jority of systemic toxicity is associated with the inhalation route[4]. Acute ingestion of elemental mercury is even considered non-toxic due to negligible absorption by intact GI mucosa (oral bioavailability of 0.04%)[3] Furthermore, most foreign bodies that enter the GI tract are eliminated in four to six days[5]. However, due to the vertical anatomy at the coecal region, foreign bodies heavier than other bowel contents are capable of entering the lumen of the appendix (elemental mercury for instance) where the peristalsis is insufficient to push it back into the GI tract[4-6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 3 Prophylactic appendectomy vs. conservative management has been described for retained mercury in the appendix. 4 , 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%