2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2013.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intense 31–35Ar beams produced with a nanostructured CaO target at ISOLDE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, we recently reported very stable and in many cases higher CaO isotope yields than ever obtained at CERN, using the results of the present sintering study to select the target operation temperature [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In fact, we recently reported very stable and in many cases higher CaO isotope yields than ever obtained at CERN, using the results of the present sintering study to select the target operation temperature [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…After the acceptance of the paper the authors became aware of the publication of new results regarding the effects of scattering limiting the attainable precision in nuclear beta decay measurements with implanted sources [57][58][59], and of the production of intense [31][32][33][34][35] Ar beams with a nanostructured CaO target [60].…”
Section: Note Added In Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the 35 Ar half-life of T 1/2 = 1.775(4) s represents a good tradeoff between the preparation of the sample in the Penning trap and the collection of statistics through its β decay. 35 Ar is also produced in large quantities at ISOLDE [26] (2.0×10 8 ions/μC [27]), and nuclear structure-related effects are well known for their superallowed mirror decay [25]. Finally it has a stable daughter isotope and a simple decay scheme.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass separation of both species was not possible in the WITCH cooler trap nor in REXTRAP due to the too-high chlorine contamination and the large number of ions involved (1×10 5 ). The development of a nanostructured CaO target and a different target cleaning procedure reduced the amount of chlorine atoms to a negligible level while achieving a greater yield of 35 Ar ions [27].…”
Section: A Technical Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%