2017
DOI: 10.1109/msp.2016.2638699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Interactive Displays in Vehicles with Intent Prediction: A Bayesian framework

Abstract: Using an in-vehicle interactive display, such as a touchscreen, typically entails undertaking a free hand pointing gesture and dedicating a considerable amount of attention, that can be otherwise available for driving, with potential safety implications. Due to road and driving conditions, the user input can also be subject to high levels of perturbations resulting in erroneous selections. In this article, we give an overview of the novel concept of an intelligent predictive display in vehicles. It can infer, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 100) and [x k+n|k ,ŷ k+n|k ] is its prediction using measurements up to time k = 9, and M = 1000 is the number of Monte Carlo runs. The ratio of 13, which is huge.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 100) and [x k+n|k ,ŷ k+n|k ] is its prediction using measurements up to time k = 9, and M = 1000 is the number of Monte Carlo runs. The ratio of 13, which is huge.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the complexity of the algorithms used in [9]- [11] was also addressed. [12]- [13] used bridging distributions for the purpose of intent inference, for example, in selecting an icon on an in-vehicle interactive display. A general class of stochastic sequences that naturally models destination-directed trajectories is missing in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] extended the results of [13] to the Gaussian case. The work of [15]- [16] for intent inference, e.g., in an intelligent interactive vehicle's display, can be interpreted in the reciprocal process setting. [17] studied the relationship between acausal systems and reciprocal processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gaussian counterpart of the generalized reciprocal sequence defined in [10] was studied in [11]. [12]- [13] used bridging distributions for the purpose of intent inference, for example, in selecting an icon on an in-vehicle interactive display. A CM sequence was used in [14] for trajectory modeling with destination information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%