2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21007-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent driving intelligence test for autonomous vehicles with naturalistic and adversarial environment

Abstract: Driving intelligence tests are critical to the development and deployment of autonomous vehicles. The prevailing approach tests autonomous vehicles in life-like simulations of the naturalistic driving environment. However, due to the high dimensionality of the environment and the rareness of safety-critical events, hundreds of millions of miles would be required to demonstrate the safety performance of autonomous vehicles, which is severely inefficient. We discover that sparse but adversarial adjustments to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
117
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
117
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve the overvalue problem of worst cases, Feng et al (38)(39)(40)(41) proposed a new definition of scenario criticality, which can be computed as a combination of maneuver challenge and exposure frequency, and generated critical cases using optimization methods and reinforcement learning techniques on various environment settings, including cut-in scenarios and car-following scenarios. To further address the challenge brought by the high dimensionality of complex environments (e.g., highway driving), Feng et al (12) proposed a framework of generating a naturalistic and adversarial driving environment by adding sparse but adversarial adjustments to the NDE. Akagi et al (42) use a self-defined risky index and NDD to sample critical cut-in scenarios.…”
Section: Corner Case Generation For Vehicle Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To solve the overvalue problem of worst cases, Feng et al (38)(39)(40)(41) proposed a new definition of scenario criticality, which can be computed as a combination of maneuver challenge and exposure frequency, and generated critical cases using optimization methods and reinforcement learning techniques on various environment settings, including cut-in scenarios and car-following scenarios. To further address the challenge brought by the high dimensionality of complex environments (e.g., highway driving), Feng et al (12) proposed a framework of generating a naturalistic and adversarial driving environment by adding sparse but adversarial adjustments to the NDE. Akagi et al (42) use a self-defined risky index and NDD to sample critical cut-in scenarios.…”
Section: Corner Case Generation For Vehicle Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To comprehensively evaluate the performance of CAVs, it is crucial to test the CAVs in different scenarios, especially the safety-critical ones. In a naturalistic driving environment (NDE), however, safety-critical scenarios rarely happen, so it is very time-consuming and inefficient to collect corner cases from either on-road test or simulation test of NDE (12,13). Therefore, how to purposely and systematically generate corner cases becomes an important problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of autonomous vehicles will depend on the detection system design [14,15] and processor speed [16,17], which are high-tech products. In order to achieve this development, it is also important to support sensor production and logistically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there has been significant work undertaken to develop real-world simulation environments for testing AVs 12 , field testing on public roads provides real-world insights that could also help inform the development of simulation environments. This study leverages the Waymo open dataset, providing access to a significant range of autonomous miles driven 9,13 across different environments and interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%