Integration of large-size photovoltaic systems into the distribution grids: a P–Q chart approach to assess reactive support capability

Abstract

This study addresses the issue of the control of both active (P) and reactive (Q) power flows injected by grid connected photovoltaic (PV) units participating in the provision of the reactive power compensation ancillary service. A model is derived allowing to define a sort of 'capability chart' for the PV unit, that is, the set of points in the P-Q plane which, at steady state, can be reached by properly operating the control system and without exceeding the physical limits of all the involved devices. To this aim, a basic algorithm is developed in the MATLAB environment relying on a simplified description of the system, which neglects the harmonics injected by the voltage source converter inverter used to connect the PV unit with a medium voltage radial distribution grid. The proposed model is used to evaluate all the possible working points in the P-Q chart; a proof of the stability of those points, using the well-known Lyapunov methods, is also annexed. Finally, simulations with the electromagnetic code PSCAD -EMTDC are performed in order to assess the validity of the approximate results and to improve the developed basic algorithm.Recently, the efforts of researchers in the field have been focused on the exploitation of PV systems not only for real

Modeling and Maximum Power Point Tracking Control of Wind Generating Units Equipped with Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generators in Presence of Losses

“…It should be observed that, if one wants to account also for the converter losses, an empirical correction to the resistances R and R T can be done without affecting the procedure (see [34] for details). The power P s0 can be expressed as: (16) and, if one inserts Equation (6) into Equation (5) and Equation (5) into Equation (9) and nullifies all the time derivatives (to account for the steady-state condition), it is possible to write the following steady state equations:…”

“…• Type I: the MPPT curve input is the actual turbine speed and produces the reference signal for the power to be produced by the PMSG [24][25][26][30][31][32][33][34] (see Figure 5). Nevertheless, in both Type I and Type II configurations, the system is obliged to work at a point whereby the active power P s produced by the PMSG follows the MPPT curve, which is not feasible, unless one neglects the losses in the electric machine.…”

Comparative study of reactive power control methods for photovoltaic inverters in low‐voltage grids

“…Solar photovoltaic (PV) power is a commercially available and reliable technology with a significant potential for long-term growth [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. A possible location for PV panels is in residential areas where they form a low-voltage (LV) distribution grid.…”

New Requirements of the Voltage/VAR Function for Smart Inverter in Distributed Generation Control

“…Inverter control strategy was proposed to allow DGs to support grid voltage during voltage sags in [16]. The limitation of maximum available active and reactive power of PV systems was evaluated in [17]. In [18], the adaptive zoning technique was proposed to recover the grid voltage within allowable limits after disturbances.…”