2017
DOI: 10.1177/0734242x17708050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of informal recycling sector in Brazil and the case of Sorocaba City

Abstract: Catadores are people who collect and sell materials that can be recycled. This activity has been done informally in many countries for years. Recently, a recognition process has begun for the informal recycling sector, with public and private initiatives. In Brazil, catadores started out associating with each other in co-operatives in the 1980s. In 2010, the Solid Waste National Policy was approved, promoting the inclusion of theses co-operatives in the formal waste management system. However, only in 25 out o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IS can be considered an ally of the formal SCS, since a relevant part of the population deliver the waste to waste pickers and recycling shops, re-directing the streams inflow into the sanitary landfill, and reducing the MSW management costs (Ferronato et al, 2020b). This is common in Latin America: in Santiago de Chile informal collectors transport the waste to an intermediate collector and, at national level, they contribute to about 86% of the total waste that is recycled (Rojas et al, 2018); and in Sorocaba, Brazil, autonomous pickers increase the recycling rate of the city to 9% (Silva de Souza Lima and Mancini, 2017). Therefore, the involvement of waste pickers represents a good option for improving sustainability in recycling activities in Latin American megacities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IS can be considered an ally of the formal SCS, since a relevant part of the population deliver the waste to waste pickers and recycling shops, re-directing the streams inflow into the sanitary landfill, and reducing the MSW management costs (Ferronato et al, 2020b). This is common in Latin America: in Santiago de Chile informal collectors transport the waste to an intermediate collector and, at national level, they contribute to about 86% of the total waste that is recycled (Rojas et al, 2018); and in Sorocaba, Brazil, autonomous pickers increase the recycling rate of the city to 9% (Silva de Souza Lima and Mancini, 2017). Therefore, the involvement of waste pickers represents a good option for improving sustainability in recycling activities in Latin American megacities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the composting of organic solid waste (88%) and the recycling of dry solid waste (86%) were the MSW treatment alternatives recommended by the experts, followed by the disposal in the landfill (83%), as recommended by other Brazilian authors [23], [24]. Composting of organic matter was considered the most suitable technology for the treatment of solid waste in Mumbai, india, according to the opinion of a panel of experts, applying the delphi method [15].…”
Section: Msw Management Strategies In the Amazon: Experts' Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informal waste pickers often face decent work challenges with low pay, insufficient hygiene, poor safety conditions (Dias, 2016;Zolnikov et al, 2018), and a lack of social security (Borges et al, 2019). The integration of the informal recycling sector into the formal waste management system contributes to social, economic, and environmental benefits (Dias, 2016;Silva de Souza Lima and Mancini, 2017). In Latin America and the Caribbean, forming cooperatives among informal waste pickers has been shown to enhance social inclusion and economic activity in Argentina, Brazil, and Colombia (Box 4.7), and more recently in other countries including Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Peru, and Venezuela (Hettiarachchi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Waste Management: a New Model Of Decent Work For Vulnerable mentioning
confidence: 99%