2023
DOI: 10.31083/j.fbe1503020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Red Blood Cell Features and Hemoglobin Levels in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Pazopanib or Cabozantinib: An Easily Exploitable Prognostic Score

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous study demonstrated the prognostic significance of the red cell-based score incorporating Hb, MCV, and RDW, in patients with mRCC undergoing TKI treatment. Patients carrying at least two favourable prognostic factors experienced notably extended PFS and OS compared to those with 0 to 1 positive prognostic factors [ 23 ]. In the present work, we aimed to validate the red cell-based score in a more actual clinical setting involving a population of patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations (TKI plus ICI or ICI plus ICI).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our previous study demonstrated the prognostic significance of the red cell-based score incorporating Hb, MCV, and RDW, in patients with mRCC undergoing TKI treatment. Patients carrying at least two favourable prognostic factors experienced notably extended PFS and OS compared to those with 0 to 1 positive prognostic factors [ 23 ]. In the present work, we aimed to validate the red cell-based score in a more actual clinical setting involving a population of patients with mRCC treated with first-line immunotherapy combinations (TKI plus ICI or ICI plus ICI).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our previous study on patients with mRCC treated with TKIs, MCV > 87 fl (macrocytosis), RDW 16% (anisocytosis) and Hb ≥ 12 g/dL (absence of anaemia) were considered favourable prognostic factors. Based on the number of positive prognostic factors, we divided our patient population into two groups: favourable group (2–3 good factors) and unfavourable (0–1 good factors) [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our previous study on patients with mRCC treated with TKIs, MCV > 87 (macrocytosis), RDW 16% (anisocytosis) and Hb ≥ 12 g/dL (absence of anaemia) were considered favourable prognostic factors. Based on the number of positive prognostic factors, we divided our patient population into two groups: favourable group (2-3 good factors) and unfavourable (0-1 good factors) [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the same population, our group developed a red cell-based score through the integration of Hb, MCV and RDW, and delineated two prognostic groups: unfavourable group (0-1 good factors) and favourable group (2-3 good factors). Irrespective of other established prognostic factors, patients in the favourable group demonstrated signi cantly longer PFS and OS when compared to those in the unfavourable group [23]. In addition to the prognostic signi cance, these studies suggested that Hb, MCV and RDW may serve as an indirect indicators of the activation and alterations of the HIF-1α pathway among patients with mRCC undergoing TKIs [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%