Synchrotron Light Sources and Free-Electron Lasers 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04507-8_37-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Hybrid Area Detectors for Storage Ring and Free-Electron Laser Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, scientific applications relying on very low photon detection noise and/or spectro-imaging capability benefit from the continuous improvements of the charge coupled device (CCD) technology during the last decade. The FastCCD (Doering et al, 2012), MPCCD (Kameshima et al, 2014) and pnCCD (Strü der et al, 2010) are a few exemplary monolithic detectors playing an important role at storage rings and FELs [see Graafsma et al (2020) and Hatsui & Graafsma (2015) for an in-depth review].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, scientific applications relying on very low photon detection noise and/or spectro-imaging capability benefit from the continuous improvements of the charge coupled device (CCD) technology during the last decade. The FastCCD (Doering et al, 2012), MPCCD (Kameshima et al, 2014) and pnCCD (Strü der et al, 2010) are a few exemplary monolithic detectors playing an important role at storage rings and FELs [see Graafsma et al (2020) and Hatsui & Graafsma (2015) for an in-depth review].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of fast X-ray 2D area detectors have been developed recently for XPCS experiments where the intensity of the incoming X-ray specular reflection pattern is measured with sub-millisecond timing resolution (Denes et al, 2009;Johnson et al, 2012;Becker et al, 2013;Pennicard et al, 2013;Hatsuia & Graafsma, 2015;Zhang et al, 2016Zhang et al, , 2018Rumaiz et al, 2016;Kleczek et al, 2018;Graafsma et al, 2020). Most of these devices are built for moderate-to-high X-ray energies, exceeding $10 keV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denes et al, 2009). For fast hybrid detectors, where incoming photons are converted to a charge in Si or other solid-state sensors and subsequently registered by a readout-specific integrated circuit (ROIC), such as event-counting Medipix/Timepix, integrating AGIPD devices (Graafsma et al, 2020) have a minimum charge threshold value corresponding to a photon energy of several keV. Detection of soft X-ray photons ($100 eV to $1.2 keV) therefore requires charge amplification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present Tensorflow versions of usual, state-of-the-art algorithms used at LCLS for all steps of processing images from X-ray integrating pixel detectors and reducing it to photons. Due to the short pulse duration at FELs (in the order of femtoseconds), photon counting detectors can't be used; instead, integrating detectors must be used [10]. Raw data from integrating pixel detectors requires (or at least benefits from) the following processing steps ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%