Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many current capture arrays were designed based on the gene models from the 2014 genome, and as such are missing or mis‐representing various genes (Brinton et al ., ). Efforts are underway to develop new capture arrays based on the improved annotations (Gardiner et al ., 2018a).…”
Section: New Strategies Accelerate Gene Discovery In Wheatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many current capture arrays were designed based on the gene models from the 2014 genome, and as such are missing or mis‐representing various genes (Brinton et al ., ). Efforts are underway to develop new capture arrays based on the improved annotations (Gardiner et al ., 2018a).…”
Section: New Strategies Accelerate Gene Discovery In Wheatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers adopting these methods are clear on the importance and utility of the data generated (e.g., Johnson et al, 2019), but often face a difficult decision during the early stages of project design. They must typically choose between the use of a universal probe set (e.g., Buddenhagen et al, 2016;Johnson et al, 2019) developed to work across larger taxonomic scales (e.g., the angiosperms), or a narrower lineage-specific probe set designed for the group of interest (e.g., Mandel et al, 2014;Weitemier et al, 2014;Vatanparast et al, 2018;Gardiner et al, 2019;Koenen et al, 2020). When considering target enrichment options, the core exons of universal probe sets are perhaps viewed as best suited for higher-level phylogenetic problems, where their conserved nature tends to have greatest utility (but see Mitchell et al, 2017;Wanke et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NimbleGen order numbers for the probe sets are as follows: Gene Capture 4 000 026 820; Promoter Capture v1, 4 000 030 160; and Promoter Capture v2, 4 000 032 530. All data are also available from the GigaScience GigaDB repository [40].…”
Section: Availability Of Supporting Data and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%