2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10852-006-9048-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Production and Distribution Planning for Södra Cell AB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, a real problem situation for the case company has been conceptualized and modelled into a scientific mathematical model, in line with Mitroff et al (1974). This model is partly based on a previous model developed by Gunnarsson et al (2007) and modified by Gunnarsson and Rönnqvist (2008). In this dissertation the previous model is referred to as the Mill Mission model, which in a modified form is currently in use at the case company for supply chain planning purposes.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As such, a real problem situation for the case company has been conceptualized and modelled into a scientific mathematical model, in line with Mitroff et al (1974). This model is partly based on a previous model developed by Gunnarsson et al (2007) and modified by Gunnarsson and Rönnqvist (2008). In this dissertation the previous model is referred to as the Mill Mission model, which in a modified form is currently in use at the case company for supply chain planning purposes.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study had a starting point in the Mill Mission model previously developed by Helene Lidestam (see e.g. Gunnarsson et al, 2007;Gunnarsson and Rönnqvist, 2008). Thus, Helene Lidestam has partly been involved in the modelling phase as well as in the writing process of Paper 2 and Paper 3.…”
Section: Author's Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fahimnia et al [2] classified the studies into seven clusters according to the SCS complexity. These clusters are given as follows: Cluster 1: single-product models [25][26][27][28]; Cluster 2: multi-product, single-plant models [29][30][31]; Cluster 3: multiple-products, multiple-plants, single-or no-warehouse models [32][33][34]; Cluster 4: multiple-products, multipleplants, multiple-warehouses, single-/no-end-user models [35][36][37]; Cluster 5: multiple-products, multiple-plants, multiple-warehouses, multiple end users, single-transport-path models [20,38,39]; Cluster 6: multiple-products, multipleplants, multiple-warehouses, multiple-end-users, multipletransport-paths, no time period models [40,41]; Cluster 7: multiple-products, multiple-plants, multiple-warehouses, multiple-end-users, multiple-transport-paths, multible-period-models [2]. To the best of the author's knowledge, a new cluster (Cluster 8) can be added to these classifications: Cluster 8: multiple-products, multiple-plants, multiple-warehouses, multiple-end-users, single-transport-path, multiple-periods models [42,43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%