2006
DOI: 10.2514/1.12802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Multidisciplinary Topology Optimization Approach to Adaptive Wing Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substantial research in past decades has focused on the aeroelastic modelling of these morphing aircraft using models of different level of complexity [11][12][13] and the optimisation of morphing aircraft by changing the wing sweep, span, chord distribution, and many other wing parameters 14 and by optimising the internal structure of the wing using topology optimisation. 15,16 However there seems to be a lack of a transparent way to discretise a morphing aircraft for optimisation in a way that results in a sufficiently low number of design variables for quick sizing, while not constraining the design space a priori. It was stated by Dr. Anna-Maria Rivas McGowan during a short course on morphing aircraft in Lisbon, Portugal, 2008 17 that there is a need for a set of generic design tools for the conceptual design of morphing aircraft that are at the right level of fidelity, so that the design space can be explored efficiently even with a large number of design variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substantial research in past decades has focused on the aeroelastic modelling of these morphing aircraft using models of different level of complexity [11][12][13] and the optimisation of morphing aircraft by changing the wing sweep, span, chord distribution, and many other wing parameters 14 and by optimising the internal structure of the wing using topology optimisation. 15,16 However there seems to be a lack of a transparent way to discretise a morphing aircraft for optimisation in a way that results in a sufficiently low number of design variables for quick sizing, while not constraining the design space a priori. It was stated by Dr. Anna-Maria Rivas McGowan during a short course on morphing aircraft in Lisbon, Portugal, 2008 17 that there is a need for a set of generic design tools for the conceptual design of morphing aircraft that are at the right level of fidelity, so that the design space can be explored efficiently even with a large number of design variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substantial research in past decades has focused on the aeroelastic modelling of these morphing aircraft using models of different level of complexity [10][11][12] and the optimisation of morphing aircraft by changing the wing sweep, span, chord distribution, and many other wing parameters 13 and by optimising the internal structure of the wing using topology optimisation. 14,15 However there seems to be a lack of a transparent way to discretise a morphing aircraft for optimisation in a way that results in a sufficiently low number of design variables for quick sizing, while not constraining the design space a priori. It was stated by Dr. Anna-Maria Rivas McGowan during a short course on morphing aircraft in Lisbon, Portugal, 2008 16 that there is a need for a set of generic design tools for the conceptual design of morphing aircraft that are at the right level of fidelity, so that the design space can be explored efficiently even with a large number of design variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus much research is devoted to understand and optimize extensive types of wing morphing for improving the aircraft performance. [1][2][3][4][5][6] However, extensive wing morphing poses significant design challenges and requires complex mechanical structures and actuators. By contrast limited but smooth morphing of a wing can often be sufficient for the needs of flight (as shown by the minimal movements of the wings of various birds in some flight conditions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%