2011 First International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control 2011
DOI: 10.1109/imccc.2011.234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Compensation Method of Three-axis Magnetometer in Geomagnetic Navigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wu et al presented a constrained total least-squares calibration method for three-axis magnetometer in vehicular applications [17]. Li et al proposed an integrated compensation method to suppress the distortion field of underwater vehicles [18]. Vasconcelos et al proposed a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) algorithm in uninhabited autonomous vehicles to compensate magnetic distortions [19].…”
Section: Measurement Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al presented a constrained total least-squares calibration method for three-axis magnetometer in vehicular applications [17]. Li et al proposed an integrated compensation method to suppress the distortion field of underwater vehicles [18]. Vasconcelos et al proposed a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) algorithm in uninhabited autonomous vehicles to compensate magnetic distortions [19].…”
Section: Measurement Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, they can be divided into two categories: dependent‐calibration with the aid of external devices or sensors [16–21] and self‐calibration based on the error model of the magnetometer [22–25]. Dependent calibrations usually utilise the reference information from external instrument such as gyroscope [16, 17, 20], 3D Helmholtz coil [18, 19], intermediate quaternion estimation by inertial fusion [21], and turntable [26]. They can achieve better performance, but the calibration process is at risk of failure when the external devices or sensors are out of order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEMS accelerometers are subject to bias error, scale factor error, misalignment errors and stochastic noise [44] [69]. Furthermore, the local magnetic fields can disturb the sensor output.…”
Section: Mems Magnetometer Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%