Aval.Psicol. 2019
DOI: 10.15689/ap.2019.1801.14668.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: RESUMOA avaliação das Funções Executivas (FE) torna-se problemática pela inexistência de um consenso metodológico quanto ao protocolo de avaliação. Destarte, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática objetivando verificar quais instrumentos foram utilizados nacional e internacionalmente nos últimos cinco anos para a avaliação das FE. Analisaram-se 35 artigos publicados em inglês e português nas bases SciELO, INDEXPSI, LILACS, PePSIC e nos periódicos CAPES. Observou-se, em sua maioria, estudos de tipo comparativo, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that the investigations in the area seem to be aligned with the multidimensional EF models (Baggetta & Alexander, 2016; Diamond, 2013; Friedman & Miyake, 2017; Karr et al, 2018), which considers these to be the core skills. Regarding the instruments most frequently used in the FM studies, the findings are paralleled by a recent review that identified the WCST, Wechsler scales (such as the Digit Span), Trail Making Test and Stroop paradigm tasks as the four most used instruments in samples of different age groups (Santana et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This shows that the investigations in the area seem to be aligned with the multidimensional EF models (Baggetta & Alexander, 2016; Diamond, 2013; Friedman & Miyake, 2017; Karr et al, 2018), which considers these to be the core skills. Regarding the instruments most frequently used in the FM studies, the findings are paralleled by a recent review that identified the WCST, Wechsler scales (such as the Digit Span), Trail Making Test and Stroop paradigm tasks as the four most used instruments in samples of different age groups (Santana et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the Stroop test, DT training reduced the time for the test, consequently demonstrating a better performance in inhibitory control, memory, reading fluency and color naming at both educational levels. This result may be related to training, since the test is specific to assess executive function 29 . The level of education influences the results of the Stroop test since education acts directly on the ability to read, to name colors, as well as to act in the inhibition and flexibility necessary to perform the test 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Tal resultado é esperado, e pode se dar pelo fato de a tarefa do Tafe ser uma adaptação do Teste de Trilhas e, desta forma, as instruções e a aplicação ocorrem de forma semelhante. O Teste de Trilhas é um dos instrumentos mais utilizados para avaliar a flexibilidade cognitiva, conforme revisão realizada por Santana et al (2019). Essa alta correlação apresentada entre o teste e as tarefas do Tafe que avaliam a flexibilidade cognitiva, portanto, é outro forte indicativo de validade convergente.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified