2007
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2006.081240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrument Comparison for Heterozygote Scanning of Single and Double Heterozygotes: A Correction and Extension of Herrmann et al., Clin Chem 2006;52:494-503

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These advanced techniques are already being adapted to existing real-time PCR instruments. In our prior studies (5,6 ), we evaluated the melting capabilities of 9 melting instruments found in our laboratory. These instruments varied in ability to detect homozygous mutants as well as to identify single-and double-heterozygous samples.…”
Section: © 2007 American Association For Clinical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These advanced techniques are already being adapted to existing real-time PCR instruments. In our prior studies (5,6 ), we evaluated the melting capabilities of 9 melting instruments found in our laboratory. These instruments varied in ability to detect homozygous mutants as well as to identify single-and double-heterozygous samples.…”
Section: © 2007 American Association For Clinical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The displacement of the double heterozygote was so great that it was distinguishable in all cases, but accurate detection of the single heterozygote was not achieved with all instruments. Table 1 shows instrument variables and measured T m SDs compiled from this and prior studies (5,6 ). The T m SDs directly affect the ability to separate different homozygous melting curves.…”
Section: © 2007 American Association For Clinical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity for this method, although dependent on the instrument and the dye used (27)(28)(29), appear superior to other scanning methods (14 ). The technique is attractive because it is simple, nondestructive, and amendable to high-throughput on 96-or 384-well plates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…High-resolution methods for detecting heterozygotes (23,24 ) and homozygotes (3, 13 ) have been applied to genotyping (4,25 ) and mutation scanning (7,26,27 ). Genotyping and scanning accuracy depends on the resolution of the melting instrument and the appropriate analytical software (14,28,29 ). Instrument resolution is critical because homozygotes may differ in T m by Ͻ1°C (3, 13 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With temperature overlap, 4 unlinked biallelic loci could have 3 (i.e., 81) possible genotype curves. The ability to distinguish many different melting curves depends on instrument resolution and may be enhanced for automated analysis with future software; however, lower-resolution instruments are likely to require temperature-correction controls and may have difficulty distinguishing some genotypes, even with the deployment of appropriate controls (14,28,29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%