“…Support for significant evolutionary impacts of glaciations comes from several phylogeographical studies and a wide spectrum of taxa, such as forest birds (Cabanne et al ., ; D'Horta et al ., ; Maldonado‐Coelho, ; Raposo Do Amaral et al ., ), frogs (Carnaval et al ., , ), and bees (Batalha‐Filho et al ., ). However, this idea has been recently challenged by an equivalent number of phylogeographical studies, also based on a wide range of taxa, such as frogs (Thomé et al ., , , ; Amaro et al ., ; Carnaval et al ., ), birds (Batalha‐Filho, Cabanne & Miyaki, ; Cabanne et al ., ) planarias (Alvarez‐Presas et al ., ; Álvarez‐Presas et al ., ), and small mammals (Leite et al ., ). Moreover, some of the later studies have proposed that the AF was not dramatically fragmented during glaciations, or even that forest dynamism was not important for evolution (Thomé et al ., ; Leite et al ., ).…”