2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.11.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into the behaviour of tool steel-aluminium alloy tribopair at different temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, wear tracks of functionalized Cu-O with minimal and medium coverage are significantly smaller than on the non-functionalized disk possibly due to adhesive failure of Cu-O. Yet, sliding against aluminum revealed immediately high friction ( Figure 3) and material transfer (Figure 4b) for the unmodified steel disk similar to previous studies [16][17][18] as well as for the disk with the non-functionalized Cu-O surface baring the widest wear track. The functionalization of Cu-O with C18PA of maximum molecular coverage outperforms all other surfaces considering the low friction against aluminum for the complete sliding distance (Figure 3), minor surface damages (Figure 4a), and no mass loss ( Table 2).…”
Section: Tribologysupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, wear tracks of functionalized Cu-O with minimal and medium coverage are significantly smaller than on the non-functionalized disk possibly due to adhesive failure of Cu-O. Yet, sliding against aluminum revealed immediately high friction ( Figure 3) and material transfer (Figure 4b) for the unmodified steel disk similar to previous studies [16][17][18] as well as for the disk with the non-functionalized Cu-O surface baring the widest wear track. The functionalization of Cu-O with C18PA of maximum molecular coverage outperforms all other surfaces considering the low friction against aluminum for the complete sliding distance (Figure 3), minor surface damages (Figure 4a), and no mass loss ( Table 2).…”
Section: Tribologysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, adhesion between tool and workpiece needs to be prevented. Particularly, this is true for forming of aluminum, where the strong interaction between workpiece and tool surface causes rapid material transfer as well as sticking increasing friction and wear observed for aluminum-steel combinations [16][17][18] as well as for coated surfaces in contact with aluminum without liquid lubrication [19][20][21]. As already emphasized in a previous study [22], functionalizing a tool steel surface with a monolayer (ML) of n-octadecylphosphonic acid (C18PA) helps to reduce friction and adhesion by the distal hydrocarbon ML-moieties weakly interacting with the aluminum surface, while the ML-molecules are chemisorbed on the steel surface by P-O-Fe bonds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a fundamental study, Huttunen-Saarivirta et al [539] have presented an insight into the tribological behaviour of H13 tool steel-6082 aluminium alloy by using a pin on disc test configuration in the context of extrusion process. The tribological tests were conducted at room temperature, 350, 400, 450, and 500 °C , respectively, and using different contact pressures (510 and 810 MPa).…”
Section: Friction and Wear At High Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In consequence, the automotive sector, which is the industrial application where hot stamping is most implanted, uses extensively hot work tool steels. Hot stamping die related friction and wear have been studied extensively employing hot work tool steels, with 1.2343 [12][13][14][15][16], 1.2344 [17][18][19][20][21][22][23], and 1.2367 [18,24] as the most frequent choices. Some have been also employed for aluminum coated steel hot stamping [20], together with proprietary steels such as Toolox ® 44 from SSAB [21], QRO90 ® Supreme from Uddeholm [2,25], or W300 ® from Böhler [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• reciprocating pin-on-disk [2,3,26,27], • reciprocating ball-on-disk [20], • regular ball-on-disk [13][14][15]18,21,27], • block-on-ring [17], • hot strip drawing [4,16,[22][23][24][25], • cross cylinder [19], • block-on-cylinder [13], • and top hat drawing test [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%