2001
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.39.4.1345-1347.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inoculum Standardization for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi Pathogenic for Humans

Abstract: Two methods of inoculum preparation for filamentous fungi were compared: counting with a hematocytometer and spectrophotometric adjustment. One hundred eighty-two filamentous fungi pathogenic for humans were used. Colony counts were done for all inoculum preparations. The agreement between the hematocytometer counts and the colony counts (CFU per milliliter) was 97.2%. The reproducibility between the hematocytometer counts and the colony counts by means of an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.70. Pearso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
81
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This standard is similar to the one published by the CLSI (formerly NCCLS) reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi, but with the following minor modifications: (i) RPMI 1640 was supplemented with glucose to reach a 2% concentration and (ii) the inoculum sizes were between 1.0 ϫ 10 5 and 5.0 ϫ 10 5 CFU/ml (1,3,16,18). The antifungal susceptibility results for the blood isolate were as follows: amphotericin B, 1 g/ml; itraconazole, Ͼ8 g/ml; voriconazole, 4 g/ml; posaconazole, Ͼ8 g/ml; and terbinafine, 2 g/ml.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This standard is similar to the one published by the CLSI (formerly NCCLS) reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi, but with the following minor modifications: (i) RPMI 1640 was supplemented with glucose to reach a 2% concentration and (ii) the inoculum sizes were between 1.0 ϫ 10 5 and 5.0 ϫ 10 5 CFU/ml (1,3,16,18). The antifungal susceptibility results for the blood isolate were as follows: amphotericin B, 1 g/ml; itraconazole, Ͼ8 g/ml; voriconazole, 4 g/ml; posaconazole, Ͼ8 g/ml; and terbinafine, 2 g/ml.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…were below the desired CFU/ml range, these suspensions may require a 10% lower dilution factor than that used for the other species, or the density of these suspensions should be adjusted by using conventional cell counting with a hemacytometer (conidial size is irrelevant). Reliable conidial suspensions can be prepared by both methods (29), but inoculum quantification is highly recommended for confirmation of actual inoculum size (CFU/ml) by either method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that germination and elongation rates are not affected by population factors and that they are intrinsic characteristics of inocula, independent of inoculum size, the longer lag phases found with smaller inocula are not due to lower germination or elongation rates but are likely due to the fact that the critical turbidity (similar to that of 4,000 70-mlong germinated spores) is reached later by smaller inocula than by larger ones. Therefore, at the end of the lag phases, the germ tubes of spores in small inocula should be longer than the corresponding germ tubes of spores in larger inocula given that the OD is a function of the number of spores or hyphae as well as of their size (12,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%