2021
DOI: 10.1080/09506608.2021.1946236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovations in craniofacial bone and periodontal tissue engineering – from electrospinning to converged biofabrication

Abstract: From a materials perspective, the pillars for the development of clinically translatable scaffoldbased strategies for craniomaxillofacial (CMF) bone and periodontal regeneration have included electrospinning and 3D printing (biofabrication) technologies. Here, we offer a detailed analysis of the latest innovations in 3D (bio)printing strategies for CMF bone and periodontal regeneration and provide future directions envisioning the development of advanced 3D architectures for successful clinical translation. Fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 189 publications
(424 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent advances associated with the development of scaffolds that provide desirable functionalities, including antiinflammatory, antimicrobial, and regenerative attributes by means of the incorporation of drugs and/or biologics, as well as engineering tools to devise defect-specific scaffolds, have been witnessed. [3][4][5] Significant progress has been made that leverages the electrospinning (solution-based) nanotechnology for the fabrication of versatile biodegradable scaffolds with 3D nanofibrous microstructure resembling the extracellular matrix (ECM) of native tissues. [6] However, this method fails to generate scaffolds with patient-specific geometries that address the 3D architectural complexity of periodontal defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances associated with the development of scaffolds that provide desirable functionalities, including antiinflammatory, antimicrobial, and regenerative attributes by means of the incorporation of drugs and/or biologics, as well as engineering tools to devise defect-specific scaffolds, have been witnessed. [3][4][5] Significant progress has been made that leverages the electrospinning (solution-based) nanotechnology for the fabrication of versatile biodegradable scaffolds with 3D nanofibrous microstructure resembling the extracellular matrix (ECM) of native tissues. [6] However, this method fails to generate scaffolds with patient-specific geometries that address the 3D architectural complexity of periodontal defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 Notably, acidic byproducts resultant from scaffold/membrane degradation are usually a common cause of clinical failure due to increasing inflammatory responses. 16,69,70 Significant control of the inflammatory condition in the periodontal defect presents the most favorable environment for bone formation and subsequently induces periodontal regeneration in the proposed rat model. At 2 weeks, all groups revealed statistically significant more new bone in the defect site when compared to the auto-healing control, but only In vivo effect of the antibiotic-laden scaffolds on bone regeneration.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, the presence of polymeric scaffolds within bone defects promotes the release of inflammatory cytokines, which, in turn, can hinder tissue healing . Notably, acidic byproducts resultant from scaffold/membrane degradation are usually a common cause of clinical failure due to increasing inflammatory responses. ,, …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AM is one of the most widely used techniques in recent times, and it is capable of building three-dimensional (3D) complex geometric structures with high dimensional precision and within a short manufacturing time. 3D objects with high levels of complexity and structural architectures are fabricated by stacking up the materials layerwise using simulated design files [22,23]. AM is also known as 3D printing, solid free-form fabrication, and rapid prototyping.…”
Section: Additive Manufacturing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%