1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1489.1999.00009.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injury Severity Scoring

Abstract: The wish to predict outcome following injury is as old as human history, but the actual measurement of injury severity began only 40 years ago. Tools are now available to measure both physical injury [the Injury Severity Score (ISS)] and physiologic derangement [the Revised Trauma Score (RTS)], as well as their synergistic combination, into a probability of survival score (TRISS). Although these tools are in daily use in most trauma centers, their predictive power is only mediocre. While adequate for estimatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the abbreviated injury scale is not immune to criticism. The reliability of the measure has been questioned as scale score determinations may be influenced by the training of medical personnel (MacKenzie et al, 1985;Osler et al, 1999;Salottolo et al, 2009). Medical response and trauma characteristics were used in multivariate models to control for this variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the abbreviated injury scale is not immune to criticism. The reliability of the measure has been questioned as scale score determinations may be influenced by the training of medical personnel (MacKenzie et al, 1985;Osler et al, 1999;Salottolo et al, 2009). Medical response and trauma characteristics were used in multivariate models to control for this variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of medical scoring scales have been designed and used by trauma centers over the past 50 years to standardize injury severity classifications (Osler, Nelson, & Bedrick, 1999). Available scales have largely been developed by professional medical organizations or committees of physicians who rely primarily on members' experience and judgment in assessing the likelihood of fatality of an injury or injuries to a body region (Baker, O'Neill, Haddon, & Long, 1974;MacKenzie, Shapiro, & Eastham, 1985).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few reviews have addressed the predictive performances of injury severity scoring tools [21,23]. However, the methodologies used for selecting studies were unclear, and the interpretation of the results was subjective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done by merging nine AIS chapters into six groups of injury severity and carefully selecting the most common descriptors covering a range of severity scales in each region of the body [26]. The database was standardized and errors were minimized using various strategies: by exclusive use of drop-down menus and check boxes, minimizing free text entry, and using standardized definitions and injury details.…”
Section: Ict Implementation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%