2017
DOI: 10.1111/imj.13418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Australia: views from the coal face

Abstract: There is scope for major improvement in GP familiarity with and use of COPD management guidelines and readily available tools and resources. Some systematic issues were highlighted in the Australian primary care setting, such as a reactive and relatively passive and delayed approach to diagnosis, potentially delayed smoking cessation advice and underutilisation of pulmonary rehabilitation. There is an urgent need to devise strategies for improving patient outcomes in COPD using resources that are readily avail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 32 Recent data in primary care reiterate systematic issues in the Australian primary care setting, such as a reactive and relatively delayed approach to diagnosis. 33 Although cost-effectiveness analysis of the case-finding protocol was not attempted, our use of pharmacy-delivered microspirometry (instead of conventional spirometry), referring only those with high risk of COPD for onward GP review and diagnosis (instead of physicians undertaking the entire process from screening to diagnosis), the brevity of the case-finding protocol and the online modes (instead of face to face) of pharmacist training may render this model of COPD case detection more economic than conventional GP-based screening models where the onus of identifying, screening and testing potential COPD cases falls entirely upon the increasingly busy practices. In support of this, pharmacists’ confidence in providing the service, including microspirometry and their fidelity to the study protocol, was high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 32 Recent data in primary care reiterate systematic issues in the Australian primary care setting, such as a reactive and relatively delayed approach to diagnosis. 33 Although cost-effectiveness analysis of the case-finding protocol was not attempted, our use of pharmacy-delivered microspirometry (instead of conventional spirometry), referring only those with high risk of COPD for onward GP review and diagnosis (instead of physicians undertaking the entire process from screening to diagnosis), the brevity of the case-finding protocol and the online modes (instead of face to face) of pharmacist training may render this model of COPD case detection more economic than conventional GP-based screening models where the onus of identifying, screening and testing potential COPD cases falls entirely upon the increasingly busy practices. In support of this, pharmacists’ confidence in providing the service, including microspirometry and their fidelity to the study protocol, was high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variability of adherence and barriers to implement guidelines due to various reasons including unfamiliarity with recommendation, concerns of underlying evidence and applicability have been identified in prior research with little apparent improvement over time [ 16 18 ]. This is a concerning issue warranting further understanding and action and supported by previous Australian studies [ 19 , 20 ]. It is vital to identify (a) specific barriers to adhere/implement guidelines and (b) preferences for interventions to improve adherence among target users [ 17 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This study highlights a necessity for GPs to maintain familiarity with evidence-based guidelines. This is supported by prior national and international studies with little apparent improvement over time (46)(47)(48)(49)(50). Additional support is likely indicated to ensure clinical practice is evidence informed.…”
Section: Implications For Research And/or Practicementioning
confidence: 87%