2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13938-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition within a premotor circuit controls the timing of vocal turn-taking in zebra finches

Abstract: Vocal turn-taking is a fundamental organizing principle of human conversation but the neural circuit mechanisms that structure coordinated vocal interactions are unknown. The ability to exchange vocalizations in an alternating fashion is also exhibited by other species, including zebra finches. With a combination of behavioral testing, electrophysiological recordings, and pharmacological manipulations we demonstrate that activity within a cortical premotor nucleus orchestrates the timing of calls in socially i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(78 reference statements)
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In songbirds, a premotor nucleus that controls song timing (25) has reciprocal connections with forebrain auditory regions (19,62). Predictive activity in this region has been reported prior to anticipated calls with a vocal partner (21), and damage to or inactivation of the motor pathway interferes with temporally precise vocal turn taking (22,23). These results are consistent with the notion that interactions between vocal motor and auditory regions may generate predictive timing signals that facilitate flexible rhythm perception.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In songbirds, a premotor nucleus that controls song timing (25) has reciprocal connections with forebrain auditory regions (19,62). Predictive activity in this region has been reported prior to anticipated calls with a vocal partner (21), and damage to or inactivation of the motor pathway interferes with temporally precise vocal turn taking (22,23). These results are consistent with the notion that interactions between vocal motor and auditory regions may generate predictive timing signals that facilitate flexible rhythm perception.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…More recently, predictive activity in the song motor pathway prior to anticipated calls has been reported during social call exchanges (21). Finally, several studies have shown that zebra finches can predict the timing of isochronous, antiphonal calls during vocal turn taking and can adjust their own call timing to avoid interference, an ability that is disrupted by manipulations of the song motor pathway (21)(22)(23). Taken together, these results are consistent with the notion that interactions between vocal motor and auditory regions may generate predictive timing signals that facilitate flexible rhythm perception.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stack call-related premotor activity of HVC interneurons is corroborated by recent results ( Benichov and Vallentin, 2020 ). For singing, structured activity of interneurons is thought to provide permissive time windows for the activity of the descending premotor neurons, which leads to a sequential motor pattern ( Kosche et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…individually targeted syllable transitions) in response to arbitrarily assigned contextual stimuli that have no prior ethological relevance. (Vignal, Mathevon, & Mottin, 2004), to enhance communication, or to avoid overlap or 'jamming' during vocal turn-taking and in response to environmental noises (Benichov & Vallentin, 2020;Brumm & Zollinger, 2013). Such ethologically relevant capacities for vocal control likely reflect evolutionary advantages of incorporating sensory and contextual information about conspecifics and the environment in generating increasingly sophisticated vocal signaling.…”
Section: Flexible Control Of Vocalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even birds with only a single song type, such as Bengalese finches, vary parameters of their song depending on social context, including the specific identity of the listener (Chen et al, 2016;Heinig et al, 2014;Sakata et al, 2008). The ability to contextually control vocalizations is also relevant for the customization of vocal signatures for purposes of individual and group recognition (Vignal, Mathevon, & Mottin, 2004), and to avoid overlap and enhance communication during vocal turn-taking and in response to environmental noises (Benichov & Vallentin, 2020;Brumm & Zollinger, 2013). Such capacities for vocal control likely reflect evolutionary advantages of incorporating sensory and contextual information about conspecifics and the environment in generating increasingly sophisticated vocal signaling.…”
Section: Evolution Of Control Over Vocal Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%