2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12289-010-0985-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infrared heating stage simulation of semi-transparent media (PET) using ray tracing method

Abstract: Stretch blow molding or thermoforming processes includes an infrared heating stage of the thermoplastic preform by infrared heaters. The knowledge of the temperature distribution on the surface and through the thickness of the preform is important to make good prediction of thickness and properties of the manufactured parts. Currently in industry, the fitting of the process parameters is given by experience and is expensive. Our objective is to provide tools that are able to simulate the heat transfers between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To estimate the impact of temperature variation due to the emissivity, a variability test was undertaken. The emissivity was set up as 0.91 for the semitransparent PEKK and 0.96 for the opaque one; these values are in agreement with previous studies [12,23] . For our variability test, the emissivity factor varies from 0.8 to 0.98.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…To estimate the impact of temperature variation due to the emissivity, a variability test was undertaken. The emissivity was set up as 0.91 for the semitransparent PEKK and 0.96 for the opaque one; these values are in agreement with previous studies [12,23] . For our variability test, the emissivity factor varies from 0.8 to 0.98.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Infrared measurements are sensitive to the emissivity of the samples. The emissivity was set up as 0.91 for the semitransparent material and 0.96 for the opaque material; these values are in agreement with previous studies [12]. To estimate the impact of temperature variation due to the emissivity, a variability test was undertaken upon the samples.…”
Section: Ii! Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This difference could be explained by many reasons: mode of deformation, strain rate, cooling rate, contact conditions, injection conditions of the preform for example. A better description of the initial temperature conditions of the stretch blow moulding process and the use of a more realistic blowing pressure evolution, as presented in Menary et al [40] or Cosson et al [41], for example, would also improve the predictions.…”
Section: Application: the Design Of Bottlesmentioning
confidence: 99%