2023
DOI: 10.1086/724843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informed Information Design

Abstract: We study informed persuasion whereby a privately informed designer without ex ante commitment power chooses disclosure mechanisms to influence agents' actions. We characterize the subset of Bayes-correlated equilibria yielding every designer type a payoff higher than what they could get from any disclosure mechanism with credible beliefs. This set of interim optimal mechanisms is non-empty and tractable, and all its elements are perfect Bayesian equilibrium mechanisms of the informed-designer game. Interim opt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, it shows why the assumption that tests cannot be perfectly accurate (Assumption (A 2 )) is crucial for this construction, and why relaxing this assumption (and thus enlarging the set of tests that the principal can deviate to) can destroy the pooling equilibrium. It also highlights the difference between Koessler and Skreta (2022) and this paper.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Second, it shows why the assumption that tests cannot be perfectly accurate (Assumption (A 2 )) is crucial for this construction, and why relaxing this assumption (and thus enlarging the set of tests that the principal can deviate to) can destroy the pooling equilibrium. It also highlights the difference between Koessler and Skreta (2022) and this paper.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 69%
“…So the outcome of this optimal test is implementable by the uninformed principal. Koessler and Skreta (2022) argue that the outcome of the test t * is not implementable by the informed principal. The reason is that if it was implementable, the informed principal would have to choose t * in both states, H and L. But when the state was H, the principal would prefer to deviate by revealing the state.…”
Section: Utilities Of Principal and Agentmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations