2021
DOI: 10.3390/e23020228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Rate in Humans during Visuomotor Tracking

Abstract: Previous investigations concluded that the human brain’s information processing rate remains fundamentally constant, irrespective of task demands. However, their conclusion rested in analyses of simple discrete-choice tasks. The present contribution recasts the question of human information rate within the context of visuomotor tasks, which provides a more ecologically relevant arena, albeit a more complex one. We argue that, while predictable aspects of inputs can be encoded virtually free of charge, real-tim… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, participants had to use a continuous sensory feedback to adapt to the statistical fluctuations we imposed for each trial (Clark, 2016;Körding & Wolpert, 2004;Piray & Daw, 2020). The responses we characterized in our task could not be observed by chance, and AR and v T influenced successful attacks and escapes (Coudiere et al, 2022;Domenici et al, 2011;Hocherman & Levy, 2000;Lam & Zenon, 2021). Higher AR and v T values in chasing trials increased uncertainty in the escaping path, making it more challenging for users to reach the target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, participants had to use a continuous sensory feedback to adapt to the statistical fluctuations we imposed for each trial (Clark, 2016;Körding & Wolpert, 2004;Piray & Daw, 2020). The responses we characterized in our task could not be observed by chance, and AR and v T influenced successful attacks and escapes (Coudiere et al, 2022;Domenici et al, 2011;Hocherman & Levy, 2000;Lam & Zenon, 2021). Higher AR and v T values in chasing trials increased uncertainty in the escaping path, making it more challenging for users to reach the target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further investigate the critical role of feedback and feedforward processes in our asymmetrical transfer, we subsequently tested whether transfer from tracking to reaching would benefit from training with a fully predictable target motion, assuming that predictability should increase the contribution of feedforward processes [25,26] that might transfer to the reaching task. Unexpectedly, the results of that control study did not match with this hypothesis since transfer of adaptation from tracking to reaching remained scarce.…”
Section: Limited Transfer From Tracking To Reachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reason that, because fast reaching movements performed with a joystick are likely of shorter duration, they might offer a better proxy of feedforward processes. Furthermore, by using a target that follows a pseudo random motion, we reason that our pursuit tracking task becomes more suitable to monitor feedback processes [25,26]. As an aside we also test transfer of adaptation when tracking training is performed with a fully predictable motion thereby presumably emphasizing the feedforward component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the contribution of online visual feedback control (i.e. the ability to exploit ongoing visual information for updating hand motor command) is expected to increase for continuous tasks, especially when tracking a target that follows an unpredictable path (Coudiere et al, 2022;Lam & Zénon, 2021). Second, when visuomotor adaptation is required, the use of continuous tasks minimizes the implication of cognitive strategies as time pressure inherent to these tasks imposes fast deliberation to ongoing actions (Yang et al, 2021;Yoo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%