2011
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2010.544282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Behaviors and Problem Chain Recognition Effect: Applying Situational Theory of Problem Solving in Organ Donation Issues

Abstract: Identification of active subpopulations who are motivated to talk about, seek out, and select information about organ donation-related issues can improve health communicators' efficacy in increasing awareness of the shortage of organ and health donors. Using the Situational Theory of Problem Solving (STOPS), we segmented the general population into more meaningful subgroups (e.g., active, aware publics about an organ donation issue) and examined whether segmented public profiles could predict their likelihood … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When Congress or parliament delegates complete and exclusive jurisdiction to a regulatory agency (read, there are no other agencies on the same stage), this is achieved by more or less rationally choosing which dimension should be stressed vis‐á‐vis an agency's specific audiences. Once the relevant dimension is selected, agencies can then choose between cross‐sectional approaches of audience segregations, which are based on fixed characteristics of audience members (e.g., psychological traits, socio‐demographic attributes); situational ones, which are specific to a particular problem or issue (e.g., issue orientation); or a mix thereof (Grunig 1989; Slater 1995; Kim et al 2011). More complicated audience segmentation strategies may evolve when some authority is given to two agencies, or when at least some portion of each agency's authority is also shared with the other agency.…”
Section: Countering Reputational Risks In a Saturated Media Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When Congress or parliament delegates complete and exclusive jurisdiction to a regulatory agency (read, there are no other agencies on the same stage), this is achieved by more or less rationally choosing which dimension should be stressed vis‐á‐vis an agency's specific audiences. Once the relevant dimension is selected, agencies can then choose between cross‐sectional approaches of audience segregations, which are based on fixed characteristics of audience members (e.g., psychological traits, socio‐demographic attributes); situational ones, which are specific to a particular problem or issue (e.g., issue orientation); or a mix thereof (Grunig 1989; Slater 1995; Kim et al 2011). More complicated audience segmentation strategies may evolve when some authority is given to two agencies, or when at least some portion of each agency's authority is also shared with the other agency.…”
Section: Countering Reputational Risks In a Saturated Media Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory presents the argument that when individuals perceive the presence of a problem (e.g., the need for PHI), feel connected to the problem, and see few obstacles in solving the problem, they will be engaged in behaviours to solve the problem. It has been previously used to guide understanding on motivations to act on health issues such as weight loss and organ donation [28,34,35].…”
Section: Perceptual Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While audience segmentation and tailoring communication have shown to impact consumers' intention to adopt behaviors (Kim, Shen, & Morgan, 2011;Warner, Chaudhary, Rumble, Lamm, & Momol, 2017;, one concern with utilizing audience segmentation techniques is its potential to further polarize audiences on specific issues (Hine et al, 2014). Therefore, messaging and communication efforts should be tailored specifically to the needs, involvement level, and intention to engage within each audience group, with purposeful and intentional roles for each subgroup within the communication or marketing efforts Lamm, Lundy, Warner, & Lamm, 2016).…”
Section: Audience Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%