2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-1034-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of age and sex on abdominal muscle and subcutaneous fat thickness

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the influences of age and sex on the thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle and subcutaneous fat at the abdomen. The two tissue thickness values were determined using ultrasonography in a total of 194 young (20-29 years) and elderly (70-79 years) persons of both genders. In both sexes, the elderly groups showed significantly thinner muscle and thicker fat than the younger groups. The percentage of the mean value of subcutaneous fat thickness in the elderly group compared to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
58
3
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
8
58
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference can simply be explained on the basis of masculinity in the post-pubertal development of male subjects as opposed to postpubertal feminization in the females. This possible sexual difference has also been reported by Kanehisha et al [32] for abdominal muscles and the findings in this study are in consonance with their report. Accordingly, the MCC of males was significantly higher than those of females (See Table 7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference can simply be explained on the basis of masculinity in the post-pubertal development of male subjects as opposed to postpubertal feminization in the females. This possible sexual difference has also been reported by Kanehisha et al [32] for abdominal muscles and the findings in this study are in consonance with their report. Accordingly, the MCC of males was significantly higher than those of females (See Table 7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This disparity could be attributed to the possibility that in females, the listed anthropometric variables have more influence on the structural disposition of the tricep surae complex while such influence is not perceived in the males possibly because of the masculinity of exercises they are exposed to in their day to day living. Chow et al [29] earlier described gender variability in the gastrocnemus and Soleus complex and Miller et al [30]; Kanehisha et al [31] and Kanehisa et al [32] described sexual differences in the size, length and degree of force generation indicating sexual dimorphism and by extension, sexual variability in the myoanthropometric relations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigators have shown that muscle strength (Gleeson et al, 1990;Peterson et al, 1991;Blain et al, 2001;Sinaki et al, 2002) and muscle mass (Pluijm et al, 2001;Szulc et al, 2005;Walsh et al, 2006) are associated with site-matched bone mineral indices, that is, BMD or bone mineral content (BMC). The greater rates of age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass (SM mass) occur in the legs and lower trunk regions, while only moderate losses occur in the upper trunk and arm regions (Reimers et al, 1998;Kanehisa et al, 2004). These regions correspond to the segments where fractures occur frequently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, resistance exercise training was not considered part of the exercise program; therefore, it is inferred that the results did not relate to improvement in muscular power. Sit-ups have been suggested as an indicator of muscle endurance, which is known to decrease with age and muscle strength [14,15]. Murata et al [16] reported that subjects who cannot perform sit-ups were significantly inferior in sitting trunk flexion to those who can do it even in the healthy elderly.…”
Section: Comparison With Standard Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%