“…It should be noted that eight studies (accounting for 36%) excluded some participants, and the average rejection rate is about 22%. Invalid participants are rejected for a variety of reasons such as unacceptable levels of calibration on the eye tracker ( Hasanzadeh et al, 2017a , b , 2018 ; Hasanzadeh et al, 2019 ), univariate outliers ( Hasanzadeh et al, 2017a ), interruptions during eye-tracking experiments ( Hasanzadeh et al, 2017a ), abnormal or incorrectible-to-normal vision ( Park et al, 2022 ), failures in pre-experiments ( Liao et al, 2019 ; Sun et al, 2020 ), and uncooperative participants ( Cheng et al, 2021 ; Park et al, 2022 ). This indicates that to ensure the sufficient experiment size of participants, the researchers should recruit more participants as appropriate.…”