2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.97.062123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the choice of postprocessing method on Bell inequalities

Abstract: In every experimental test of a Bell inequality, we are faced with the problem of inefficient detectors. How we treat the events when no particle was detected has a big influence on the properties of the inequality. In this work, we study this influence. We show that the choice of post-processing can change the critical detection efficiency, the equivalence between different inequalities or the applicability of the non-signaling principle. We also consider the problem of choosing the optimal post-processing st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Bell tests, the assignment strategy leads to lowering the maximally achievable quantum value of the Bell inequality, but does not increase the local bound [24]. As we show in the next section, this is not true in general for entanglement witnessing, and some local assignments can lead to negative values.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Bell tests, the assignment strategy leads to lowering the maximally achievable quantum value of the Bell inequality, but does not increase the local bound [24]. As we show in the next section, this is not true in general for entanglement witnessing, and some local assignments can lead to negative values.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The literature that addresses the detection inefficiency problem, primarily in the context of the Bell test, describes two primary methods for handling no-click events [24]. In the first approach, referred to as the discard strategy, one simply ignores all the events where at least one of the detectors did not click (for estimation of joint probabilities).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The key problem that we investigate in this work is how the no-click events affect the expectation value of W and, consequently, entanglement detection. The literature that addresses the detection inefficiency problem, primarily in the context of the Bell test, describes two primary methods for handling no-click events [25]. In the first approach, referred to as the discard strategy, one simply ignores all the events where at least one of the detectors did not click (for estimation of joint probabilities).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%