2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-021-06211-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Specimen Layout on 17-4PH (AISI 630) Alloys Fabricated by Low-Cost Additive Manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously published studies have shown that fast printing speeds decrease the green part density. The maximum possible printing speed of 24 mm/s is thus in a similar range to previously published optimum printing speeds of 20 mm/s [ 16 , 17 , 38 ]. By applying 4 mm/s increments, the resulting printing speed interval ranges from 4 to 24 mm/s, and those printing speeds that satisfy Equation (6) are highlighted in gray in Table 3 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previously published studies have shown that fast printing speeds decrease the green part density. The maximum possible printing speed of 24 mm/s is thus in a similar range to previously published optimum printing speeds of 20 mm/s [ 16 , 17 , 38 ]. By applying 4 mm/s increments, the resulting printing speed interval ranges from 4 to 24 mm/s, and those printing speeds that satisfy Equation (6) are highlighted in gray in Table 3 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Since parts produced by MEX generally exhibit a distinct anisotropy in their mechanical properties [ 35 , 36 , 37 ], a total of three different build orientations (flat, side, and vertical) were analyzed, as can be seen in Figure 9 . The anisotropy is due to the layer bonding which is significantly stronger along the layers than between them [ 38 ]. For each build orientation, four tensile specimens were printed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This process has become increasingly popular for various material fabrications, such as ceramic, polymer and metal [2][3][4][5]. Many metal AM processes, such as powder bed fusion (PBF), direct energy deposition (DED) and materials extrusion (MEX) can successfully fabricate various metals, e.g., stainless steel [6][7][8][9], titanium alloys [10][11][12][13], nickel alloys [14][15][16][17][18], cobalt [19,20] and aluminium alloys [21][22][23][24][25]. AM can also provide a high degree of freedom, lightweight design with almost unlimited shape, complexity and a varied range of sizes depending on the printing process [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, dimensions of the CAD model need to be carefully compensated to acquire the required dimension after sintering. The sintered density and mechanical properties of the metal MEX part are theoretically lower than those of MIM due to the voids between deposited paths generated during printing [8]. Thereby, the print strategy, which can generate not only such voids but also deflection and incomplete weld in polymer 3D-print parts [128][129][130], needs to be carefully controlled for metal MEX before progressing to the debinding and sintering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%