2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(01)00436-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of sensitisation to environmental mycobacteria on subsequent vaccination against bovine tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
95
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
95
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the stronger mycobactericidal activity observed for the bovine macrophages used in our study may have resulted from the cattle having been sensitized by natural exposure to environmental mycobacteria, although they had negative test results for tuberculin. This phenomenon has been suggested as a probable explanation for the highly variable efficacy of BCG vaccination in both humans (7) and cattle (10). In the bovine study, BCG vaccination was seen to be moderately effective in protecting cows against tuberculosis in two experimental trials but was ineffective in a third trial using cattle that were accredited as being tuberculosis-free.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is possible that the stronger mycobactericidal activity observed for the bovine macrophages used in our study may have resulted from the cattle having been sensitized by natural exposure to environmental mycobacteria, although they had negative test results for tuberculin. This phenomenon has been suggested as a probable explanation for the highly variable efficacy of BCG vaccination in both humans (7) and cattle (10). In the bovine study, BCG vaccination was seen to be moderately effective in protecting cows against tuberculosis in two experimental trials but was ineffective in a third trial using cattle that were accredited as being tuberculosis-free.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Apart from being potentially infectious to cattle, either by ingestion or more likely by creation of an aerosol during olfactory investigation, there is a possibility that the presence of environmental M. bovis could compromise test-andslaughter programmes for bTB control and help explain bTB persistence. Sensitization of cattle to other species of environmental mycobacteria can compromise cattle immune responses to subsequent vaccination with BCG (Buddle et al 2002), and can cause cattle to remain skin-test negative even though they are potentially infectious (Hope et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some recent vaccine models of tuberculosis in which animals were first exposed to environmental mycobacteria, BCG provided little or no protection against tuberculosis (Brandt et al, 2002 ;Buddle et al, 2002), although in the second of those studies chemical mutants of M. bovis gave significant protection. These differences in protection may result from differences in persistence between BCG and other avirulent strains or from stimulation of a qualitatively different immune response.…”
Section: Vaccination Studymentioning
confidence: 99%