LC-DCP is claimed to be a better implant as compared with the conventional DCP, with respect to low-bone-surface-contact, decreased incidence of porosity, increased and better vascularity of bone tissue, and earlier healing time. In the present study the experimental study was performed on 8-adult dogs divided into 2-groups, A and B. In Groups A and B, DCP and LC-DCP implants were used, respectively. The efficacy of the two plate systems was assessed on the basis of physiological parameters, radio-graphic evaluation. Each dog was radio graphed with medio-lateral projection (ACOMA, JAPAN, Df-50). The radiographs were obtained at an interval of 2 weeks to examine the progress of callus formation with respect to each plate fixation system. Group A showed not good callus formation as some have large callus. Group B dogs showed ideal fixation of implant with accurate Small callus formation. From all this results of this study clearly proved that LC-DCP is better implant than DCP in terms of above parameters for repair of femoral fracture especially in dogs.All copyrights reserved to Nexus® academic publishers