2008
DOI: 10.1177/0363546508322899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Scaffold Stiffness on Subchondral Bone and Subsequent Cartilage Regeneration in an Ovine Model of Osteochondral Defect Healing

Abstract: The results imply that subchondral defect filling in clinical settings advances bone regeneration and should have a comparable stiffness to that of healthy subchondral bone rather than being too flexible. Degradation of resorbable materials and consequently the loss of stiffness may compromise the healing of critical defects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(72 reference statements)
3
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…10 For the evaluation of osteochondral reconstructions, histologic and mechanical examination protocols are suggested. 15 Mechanical properties of healthy cartilage and cartilage regenerates have been thoroughly investigated. 16,17 The use of equilibrium modulus by creep indentation testing has been used in several animal models, including the mini pig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 For the evaluation of osteochondral reconstructions, histologic and mechanical examination protocols are suggested. 15 Mechanical properties of healthy cartilage and cartilage regenerates have been thoroughly investigated. 16,17 The use of equilibrium modulus by creep indentation testing has been used in several animal models, including the mini pig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly important in differentiation of cells, as well as the mechanotransductive signaling between cells that facilitate successful regeneration of anisotropic tissues. Cell-free graft techniques, which use biocompatible and degradable materials as a scaffold to support endogenous tissue regeneration, show promise in animal models but have yet to find clinical success [36][37][38] . Cell-seeded, biphasic scaffolds may serve as an integrated solution to reca pitulate the osteochondral interface and underlying bone [37,39] , but despite the success in pre-clinical stu dies, only three biphasic osteochondral scaffolds have extensive clinical application [40] .…”
Section: Drawbacks Of Current Tissue Engineering Approaches For Osteomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…osteoblasts require stiffer materials (150MPa), whereas embryonic cardiomyocytes require softer materials (modulus 1kPa) for regeneration of bone and cardiac tissue respectively. 72,73 As the materials aim to mimic the ECM that surrounds the cells, especially in the heart; the materials also need to be able to be structurally capable of withstanding the dynamic forces of the pulsatile heart.…”
Section: Physical Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%