2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1984-46702011000100012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest

Abstract: One of the most commonly used sampling techniques to capture leaf litter amphibians, lizards and small mammals is a set of pitfall traps with drift fences. However, there are still many speculations concerning the effectiveness of different designs of pitfall traps and the most adequate size of each trap. To address this problem, we conducted the first standardized comparison of patterns of species richness, rank-abundance, and community structure of leaf litter amphibians, lizards and small mammals for two tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possibility would be to simulate captures, as opposed to fence encounters, by modeling individual animal movements upon reaching a fence. Complicated fence arrangements, such as X or Y shapes, are expected to funnel certain animals towards a trap once they encounter a fence (Morton et al 1988), although several field studies (Hobbs et al 1994, Ribeiro-Jú nior et al 2011, Ellis 2013 as well as our simulations indicate that simple straight fences are likely to give higher encounter rates per unit length of fence. The choice of placement of traps along a fence (middle or ends), spacing between traps, and length of fences may all depend on the behaviors of different species on encountering a fence and require further study.…”
Section: Potential To Extend the Simulation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Another possibility would be to simulate captures, as opposed to fence encounters, by modeling individual animal movements upon reaching a fence. Complicated fence arrangements, such as X or Y shapes, are expected to funnel certain animals towards a trap once they encounter a fence (Morton et al 1988), although several field studies (Hobbs et al 1994, Ribeiro-Jú nior et al 2011, Ellis 2013 as well as our simulations indicate that simple straight fences are likely to give higher encounter rates per unit length of fence. The choice of placement of traps along a fence (middle or ends), spacing between traps, and length of fences may all depend on the behaviors of different species on encountering a fence and require further study.…”
Section: Potential To Extend the Simulation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…larger buckets could be more efficient in preventing more individuals from escaping). However, some studies have suggested that bucket size may not affect significantly the richness and abundance of amphibians and reptiles sampled by pitfall traps in tropical forests (Webb 1999, Ribeiro-Júnior et al 2011. Nevertheless, pitfall traps have not proven to be an efficient method for short-term herpetofaunal inventories, at least in Atlantic Forest areas (e.g., Almeida-Gomes et al 2008, Siqueira et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were collected mostly with pitfall traps (PFT), this being a largely successful and effective method to capture amphibians and reptiles (Mengak and Guynn 1987;Ribeiro-Júnior et al 2011). Pitfall traps were installed in stations consisting of four buckets each (each bucket with 60 liters capacity), arranged in a radial pattern (explained in detail in Cechin and Martins 2000).…”
Section: Collection and Analysis Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%