Influence of ovarian hormones on value-based decision-making systems: Contribution to sexual dimorphisms in mental disorders

Abstract

Women and men exhibit differences in behavior when making value-based decisions. Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain these findings, stressing differences in functional lateralization of the brain, functional activation, neurotransmitter involvement and more recently, sex hormones. While a significant interaction of neurotransmitter systems and sex hormones has been shown for both sexes, decision-making in women might be particularly affected by variations of ovarian hormones. In this review we have gathered information from animal and human studies on how ovarian hormones affect decision-making processes in females by interacting with neurotransmitter systems at functionally relevant brain locations and thus modify the computation of decision aspects. We also review previous findings on impaired decision-making in animals and clinical populations with substance use disorder and depression, emphasizing how little we know about the role of ovarian hormones in aberrant decision-making.

The central nervous system can directly regulate breast cancer progression and blockage by quercetin

“…Furthermore, CRS promoted the occurrence of breast cancer in MMTV-PyMT mice, which was also disrupted by the antidepressant drug. dopamine, adrenaline, and noradrenaline (31,32). Recent studies have shown that damage to the normal structure and function of microglia is due to strong inflammatory activation or decline, and chronic unpredictable stress exposure may lead to depression and related disorders in neuroplasticity and neurogenesis.…”

A neurobiological perspective on social influence: Serotonin and social adaptation

“…Processes of social influence can be divided into distinct components, each with potentially different underlying neurobiological mechanisms that are modulated differently by internal and external factors (Ambrase et al, 2020). The depth of social information processing and integration depends on how relevant the information is to the self (Johnson & Eagly, 1989).…”

“…The depth of social information processing and integration depends on how relevant the information is to the self (Johnson & Eagly, 1989). Self‐relevance directly influences the subjective computation of value that signals expected reward or punishment and guides decision of behavior (Ambrase et al, 2020; Falk & Scholz, 2018). During value‐based decision‐making, choices of action are made on the basis of reward expectations by assigning subjective value to the options available (Ambrase et al, 2020).…”

“…Self‐relevance directly influences the subjective computation of value that signals expected reward or punishment and guides decision of behavior (Ambrase et al, 2020; Falk & Scholz, 2018). During value‐based decision‐making, choices of action are made on the basis of reward expectations by assigning subjective value to the options available (Ambrase et al, 2020). The brain's reward system is suggested to involve three dissociable neurobiological and psychological processes: liking (hedonic impact of rewarding stimuli), wanting (incentive salience or the approach to reward‐related stimuli), and learning (Berridge et al, 2009).…”

“…RPEs are relayed to the prefrontal and cingulate cortex via dopaminergic projections from the striatum. Serotonergic signals from the RN to frontal cortical areas encode subjectivity in valuation signals and have mainly been associated with the formation of “liking” (Ambrase et al, 2020; Homberg, 2012; Li et al, 2016).…”